[savedbygrace]

I've taken them apart and put them back together again, so you could say I've built Macs.

I can see, though, that you cleverly missed the point of my post. Even though the mobo in this box was defective, I still reported that the Windows box is nearly as stable as Mac OS X v10.2.2.

Any computer part be be defective. That was what happened to me in this case. But in spite of that, I still fairly reported the truth: that WinXP is almost as stable as Jaguar.

Windows fanatics would never give an inch on this issue, never admitting that a Mac is any good whatsoever. You'll flail around trying to diss Macs and Mac owners as if it were your religion or something.

IOW, Windoze fanatics argue a lot like liberals.

[Last Visible Dog]

Windows fanatics would never give an inch on this issue, never admitting that a Mac is any good whatsoever. You'll flail around trying to diss Macs and Mac owners as if it were your religion or something.

Look up from your script. I am not the fanatic – I use what works and what people pay me to use. I have not dissed the Mac – I have only pointed out the nonsense in Mac-head’s statements. You have got a really bad case of projection – it is Mac-heads that are flailing about desperately trying to claim metaphysical superiority of their overpriced computer/fashions statements.

You guys need to “THINK FOR YOURSELF” and not just repeat the Apple slogans.

IOW, Windoze fanatics argue a lot like liberals.

Yeah right. Mac-heads play fast and loose with the truth just like liberals