Oh, man. You're a hair splitter. How I hate hairsplitting. Would you like to argue what the definition of "is" is after we're through here?
I never said this. Your dishonesty is stunning and funny. I did say that to claim that Jesus did not die for anybody's sins is blasphemous.
So someone who is blasphemous isn't a blasphemer? That's one mighty fine hair to be splitting, there.
You are the one who paintbrushed this to be all historians and are now busy burning this straw man down. You have lost this argument from the start and don't even know. Funny!
I paintbrushed it to all historians because the vast majority of historians aren't out writing in history books that Jesus died for our sins. But hey, if it bothers you so much that I'm including a small minority of historians in my paintbrush, then let me rephrase that line.
CCWoody:
The vast majority of historians are blasphemers!
Better?
Just checking to see if you can recognize some basic doctrines of the Bible.
Ah, I see. Now you're the Arbiter of who's a Christian and who's not. Let me say right away that I'm Catholic, in case that matters.