Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Santorum's Sacrifice
American Prowler ^ | 1/5/03 | The Prowler

Posted on 01/06/2003 2:04:58 PM PST by Jean S

Trent Lott last Thursday informed current, now former Senate Rules Committee chairman Rick Santorum that he indeed wanted this colleague's committee. This after turning down the Rules Committee prior to the New Year.

Santorum, who was one of the most loyal lieutenants Lott had in the leadership, offered his old boss his committee around the time that Lott stepped down as Republican leader. At that point, Lott turned him down. But over the holidays Lott apparently had a change of heart, and informed Santorum he would take the chairmanship.

Lott's decision should be alarming to conservatives everywhere. Not only does he now control a committee in which he will have to negotiate with Democrats on everything from staffing budgets for committees to office space, he has perhaps irreparably set back Republican leadership for a decade.

This is because Santorum, like Sen. Mitch McConnell, played the Senate game the best he could. Both McConnell and Santorum remained loyal to their leader Lott in a time of difficulty, while also moving their caucus forward with the nomination and election of Sen. Bill Frist. Now both men have been damaged by their support of Lott, and Santorum is out his committee chairmanship.

"Lott has been terrible at developing young talent for leadership positions, and this decision to basically knock one of his own people down a peg just shows how short sighted he really is," says a Senate leadership staffer. "Rick did the honorable thing, and we all admire him for it, but Lott should have been a big enough man to let a man who was loyal to him keep a committee he had earned."

If conservatives aren't outraged by Lott's ham-handed land grab, says another Republican leadership staffer, they should be alarmed that Lott now controls a potentially critical committee.

"When Rick was in charge of Rules, they were taking a hard line with Democrats, refusing to give them an equitable share of staffing levels, budgets, and the like," says the Senate aide. "I mean we were really acting like a majority party and not giving the Democrats a single thing. We were going to have an advantage."

Democrats had already gone moaning to the press, complaining that Republicans were acting unfairly, but Santorum had held fast. According to several leadership staffers, however, once Lott got deeper into his controversy, and it appeared he was in danger of losing his job, he attempted to give the Democrats everything they wanted out of the Rules Committee and more, even though some Republicans Senators and staffers asked him not to.

"He was so scared about losing his job he was willing to sell us down the river for a bunch of jobs, desks and computers," says a Budget Committee staffer. "It was embarrassing."

Now Lott controls the Rules Committee, and Republicans are concerned that Lott will simply cave once again. "This may be the first real challenge Majority Leader [Bill] Frist faces," says the Budget staffer. "If Frist knew what was best for the caucus, he'd tell Lott to step back and let Santorum back in."


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: lott; rulescommittee; senate

1 posted on 01/06/2003 2:04:58 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Aside from the lack of Lott's vision and the slap to Santorum, one would think that Lott might have FINALLY figured out that the Demo's aren't out to be play nice and that he's in a position to stick it to them.

Those who fail to remember history are resigned to repeat it.

2 posted on 01/06/2003 2:12:58 PM PST by alancarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Why should Senator Lott be chairman of the Rules Committee?

SANTORUM: One of the things I believe very strongly is that we need to put our best team on the field. And a few years ago, when I was on the Ag Committee, I was scheduled to be a subcommittee chairman, and Pat Roberts was a new senator coming from Kansas, was chairman of the Ag Committee, and I stepped aside to allow him to serve on the important subcommittee ...

SNOW: So you think Trent Lott's better qualified than you would be?

SANTORUM: Well, the Rules Committee is an institutional committee. It basically runs the Capitol, if you will. It's sort of the mayor of Capitol Hill is the chairman of the Rules Committee. And I think someone with his tremendous experience as leader in running the operations of the Senate would bring a lot to the table.

And so, yes, I mean I've got enough to do on the other duties that I have, and I think that Senator Lott can make a contribution and would be a good member of the team.

SNOW: You predicted a few weeks ago that he would actually stay on as majority leader. You think that he got a bum deal?

SANTORUM: You know, that's old news. I think his comments were certainly taken out of context. But, you know, he said some things he knows that he shouldn't have said, and he suffered, you know, he suffered the ultimate consequences of making those statements.

I think Trent realizes that, you know, that's the consequences he suffered, and it's time to move on. And I think that we as a Senate will move on and hopefully learn from that experience.

SNOW: And it's time for us to move on. Senator Rick Santorum, thanks for joining us.

SANTORUM: Thank you, Tony.

http://www.foxnews.com/printer_friendly_story/0,3566,74638,00.html

3 posted on 01/06/2003 2:16:40 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Lott is pathetic. Pathetic.
4 posted on 01/06/2003 2:17:08 PM PST by Petronski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
SNOW: Will the Senate pass a ban on partial-birth abortion?

SANTORUM: Absolutely. That's one of the things that we could not get scheduled under Senator Daschle last session of Congress. It will be scheduled relatively promptly this session of Congress, as well as other important things that didn't see the light of day, like cloning.

5 posted on 01/06/2003 2:17:35 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Great minds think alike (I just posted this myself). I wish Lott would just find the deepest hole he can find and crawl into it. What good does crap like this do us? Might as well let the DemoRats have the damn majority back. Selfish bastard!
6 posted on 01/06/2003 2:17:38 PM PST by GreatOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Sounds like Santorum was being loyal to his colleague and friend when he was down. I hope the leadership remembers him for it.

And Frist better give Lott his marching orders running that committee and play hardball like Santorum did. And Lott better go along, or know that the caucus will take action. Everyone needs to know there is new leadership in place, and that they won't countenance weakness or disloyalty.

Hey, its the way the Rats played it when they ran the place. I don't think they have any moral standing to complain. This is politics, and when you're in the majority you run the place your way, and the minority has to get along as best it can. We'e played the go-along-to-get-along game too long with these Rats, and whenever we do they stab us in the back. I say to hell with that noise...

7 posted on 01/06/2003 2:22:34 PM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chimera
"We've played the go-along-to-get-along game too long with these Rats, and whenever we do they stab us in the back. I say to hell with that noise..."

From what I have seen this past week (well, actually longer) the Rats are no longer stabbing us in the back...they've become "Chucky" dolls and like "Psyco" in the shower...they're just stabbing every-which-away. The liberal Dems have declared all-out-war right out in the open, so there can be no more "go-along-to-get-along"...they won't allow it. They will bite off an offered hand or spit right square in a conciliatory face.

Hey, the liberals have come right out and declared: "No More Misters Nice Guys", so it now seems obvious that there is a "you're either with us or against us" policy with them.

I'm glad we're against them and when our policies work and their's don't, guess who will be looking for work in 2004?

As for Senator Santorum, he is a total class act and PA would do well to find another just like him to replace that RINO Arlen Specter. What a beautiful fantasy: two Senators like Rick Santorum in PA and no more Specter....ah, I need to wake up now...

8 posted on 01/06/2003 2:45:37 PM PST by KriegerGeist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Geist Krieger
What a beautiful fantasy: two Senators like Rick Santorum in PA and no more Specter....ah, I need to wake up now...

Ahhhh--that would be sooo nice -- Spector irritates me no end -- every time I hear that 3 or 4 republicans have voted differently than the rest, I just KNOW that ol' Arlen is gonna be on that short list -- grrrr !

9 posted on 01/06/2003 3:01:01 PM PST by twyn1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GreatOne
That selfish bastard could have stuck it right up your selfish ass by leaving the senate and then you would have your pound of flesh and nothing else.
10 posted on 01/06/2003 4:41:35 PM PST by cksharks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Geist Krieger
Rick Santorum homeschools his kids. His wife is an attorney and registered nurse. They both take turns during the week homeschooling.

I know that this fact has nothing to do with this article, but what the heck.
11 posted on 01/06/2003 4:49:23 PM PST by ladylib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
I am too tired to respond.
12 posted on 01/06/2003 4:54:39 PM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
SANTORUM: I think his comments were certainly taken out of context.
13 posted on 01/06/2003 4:57:00 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Iwas very concerned when I heard Santorum had stepped aside to give Lott a chairmanship. Admirable, yes, but, as the author stated, Lott the Bobblehead should have known better than to accept Santorum's gracious offer.

I am also concerned that this takes back what we gained by taking Lott out of a leadership position in the first place. True, it's not on par with the SML position, but the point was that Lott should not, at least not right away, be in leadership.

We need Santorum in a position to be a "player," as Lott so stupidly describes himself.

On another post, the House is putting together a new committee to oversee homeland security. My suggestion: establish a counterpart committee in the Senate and make Santorum the chairman.
14 posted on 01/06/2003 5:56:53 PM PST by fightinJAG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson