Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hatteras
Of course, your saying that IF the 49er was guilty of pass interference. Judging by the way they've been calling all the games these past few years, there would have been a 50/50 chance of that happening...

Naaahhh. I see what you are saying but the pass interference was pretty obvious. He tackled the guy. I just walked away from the TV(after screaming several of the seven words) when I saw it was an O-lineman and assumed he was ineligible.

199 posted on 01/06/2003 1:16:19 PM PST by amused
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]


To: amused
Well well well, the truth comes out, and I'm telling you, I knew something was fishy with the ending of that game, but couldn't quite put my finger on it do to the mistaken information be foisted upon us by the Fox announcers.

I knew that games cannot end on offsetting penalties, and it has happend before.

And now will those football ignorants please shut up about "it's not interference if the player's ineligible" nonesense. Seubert was eligible. That position is always eligible in that formation.

Of course the game never should have gotten to that point, but it did. And yet again, the Giants get screwed by poor officiating.

Well at least the NFL is sorry....
215 posted on 01/06/2003 1:26:23 PM PST by motzman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson