Replies

I haven't seen you post anything to back up your assertions that the vast majority of pot smokers are liberal, Ralph Nader worshiping greenie whackos. Did you even bother to look for it?

And I never seen you denounce the #1 moneybags to your pro-drug cause(Hillary friend #1, George Soros).

Oh well anyway you all are losing in the arena of ideas(i.e the beating the pro-drug intiatives took at the ballot box on November 5th, 2002).

I guess you all will be getting behind another smarmy and lying southern democrat(John Edwards) like you all did in 92, IMO.

And I never seen you denounce the #1 moneybags to your pro-drug cause(Hillary friend #1, George Soros).

And I don't intend to. Guilt by association is a logical fallacy not worth dignifying with a response. When and if you ever have a rational argument, I'll be more than happy to address it.

[tacticalogic:] I haven't seen you post anything to back up your assertions that the vast majority of pot smokers are liberal, Ralph Nader worshiping greenie whackos. Did you even bother to look for it?

And I never seen you denounce the #1 moneybags to your pro-drug cause(Hillary friend #1, George Soros).

One is intellectually obligated to support one's claims; one is not intellectually obligated to denounce the wrong ideas of people who happen to share one's right idea on a certain issue. Your squirming and dodging is quite pathetic.

For the record, I am firmly against 99% of what George Soros stands for. But I would no more oppose drug freedom because he supports it than I would stop breathing air because he breathes air.

I guess you all will be getting behind another smarmy and lying southern democrat(John Edwards) like you all did in 92

More baseless assertions. Provide evidence that any drug-freedom advocate supported the Democrat in 1992; I did not.