Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RAT Patrol
a statement that some studies have found an increased risk of cancer while others have not. That statement, while technically accurate

does nothing to advance the “women’s rights” cause of sucking babies out of wombs.

The statement is accurate, and that enrages the Times.

6 posted on 01/06/2003 8:47:36 AM PST by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: dead
and that enrages the Times. hehehehehe!
8 posted on 01/06/2003 8:49:22 AM PST by RAT Patrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: dead

and that enrages the Times

The Times According to William Proctor About the Author
Bill Proctor is a graduate of Harvard College and Harvard Law School, and has worked as a reporter for the New York Daily News. He has written or co-authored more than 70 nonfiction books, including several national bestsellers.

William Proctor '66 recognizes the New York Times's preeminence as the country's newspaper of record. That's why he reads it every morning, and why he's written a book lambasting it.

He is, on the other hand, adamantly opposed to abortion. He questioned how, with regard to the animal rights movement, the paper can be "moving towards giving animals a certain degree of personhood that they wouldn't accord to a fetus two minutes before birth."

16 posted on 01/06/2003 9:08:38 AM PST by Remedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson