Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Desdemona
the institute will have no excuse to suppress the information.

The only thing that is being suppressed is the preponderance of studies linking abortion and breast cancer. (even some by abortion advocates) Is there any other potential health threat that the New York Times is willing to so casually dismiss? For example, the danger of second hand tobacco smoke is far more disputable than the health risks of abortions.

The New York Times has made getting women into the Masters golf tournament its centerpiece. Which issue is going to effect the lives of more woman, whether they can become member of a golf club in Georgia or whether a procedure performed on over a million women a year may raise their risk for cancer?

20 posted on 01/06/2003 9:36:12 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway
The scariest thing about the NYT in all this is the gatekeeper role they like to play.

"All the news that fit to print." Riiiggghhht.
23 posted on 01/06/2003 9:45:09 AM PST by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson