Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why I Hate Microsoft [A Formal look at the MS/Linux Wars]
EURONET.NL ^ | 06jan02 | frankvw

Posted on 01/06/2003 4:00:44 AM PST by chilepepper

From the title of this paper you may have guessed that I am less than pleased with the guys in Redmond. One might even say that my dislike for Microsoft is a pet hate gone out of control in an almost quixotic fashion. Why is this?

Of course I have been accused of personal antipathy, of being jealous of Bill Gates and his billions, and of being prejudiced against all things Microsoft without any reason whatsoever. But none of this is true. I have nothing personal against Bill Gates. Why should I? I don't know the man, I've never met him. I agree with those who say he might be the most succesful salesman in history. And I've always thought that even one billion in almost any currency is more than I could reasonably spend.

No. It's rather his business practices, and that of his company, that I am opposed to, for a large and still growing number of reasons, most of which are plain, verifiable facts. Let me explain.

ABSTRACT

Microsoft controls the current software market and has a de facto monopoly on the desktop. This monopoly has not been achieved and is not being maintained by offering the user community better products than Microsoft's competitors can offer. On the contrary, Microsoft has earned a reputation for selling unreliable software.

Windows is a technically inferior operating system with a seriously flawed architecture, weak security model and sloppy code, while other Microsoft applications are equally kludgey. New Microsoft products offer no essential improvements over previous or competing products, and their Return On Investment is between small and zero, in spite of Microsoft's boasts about being innovative and customer-driven.

Instead of making better software, Microsoft has focused on using brilliant but doubtful marketing tactics to force their products upon the user community in order to establish and maintain their monopoly. These methods include a tight integration of applications into the operating system, the bundling of applications with Windows to force competing application vendors out of the market, the mandatory bundling of Windows with new computer equipment, deliberate limitations in the compatibility of their own software with competing products, contracts that prohibit third parties to do business with anyone but Microsoft, and retaliatory practices against non-cooperating vendors. In addition to this, third-party developers are induced, through cheap or free development kits and the sabotaging of alternatives, to develop applications that contain proprietary system calls, are virtually non-portable, and are therefore bound to the MS-Windows platform. These methods only serve to further inflate Microsoft's already obscene profit margins, at the price of the interests of the user community, the IT market and the field of computer technology as a whole.

(Excerpt) Read more at euronet.nl ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Technical
KEYWORDS: fraud; linux; microsoft
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-133 last
To: Bush2000
Microsoft is pretty heavily regulated by government bureaucrats now.

Yeah... Right...

121 posted on 01/08/2003 12:20:50 PM PST by TechJunkYard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: chilepepper
When the jokers in our accounting department got a new machine running Office2000 and started to generate documents that weren't compatable with Office97...

Something doesn't jibe here. Which application? Office 2000 should open all of the 97 formats without any problems.
122 posted on 01/08/2003 2:46:47 PM PST by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: TechJunkYard
So what? Just because there's multiple serial murderers working the strip, doesn't make any of them less guilty.

Dude, you're so ideologically blind that you don't know what competition is anymore.
123 posted on 01/08/2003 2:48:24 PM PST by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
My point exactly: the Office97 could not read the documents generated by Office2000 and those who generated the documents didn't notice this until they were pretty far along: only THEY could read their documents... (I have no idea what features in Office2000 they used to make this happen since I was standing on the sidelines)

Result: the company bit the bullet and upgraded all the OTHER machines to Office2000 and features that were only marginally better than the ones they already had.

It is merely coincidence that we had layoffs six months later but that extra money would have come in handy in trying to save a job or two. I lost some good friends in those layoffs -- one was so upset that he developed Grey's disease, which can be brought on by stress. He was really devastated.

Did the extra money spend on the Office2000 CAUSE this? Of course not, but by the laws of unintended consequences it may have had an affect...

124 posted on 01/08/2003 4:33:10 PM PST by chilepepper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: chilepepper
A "formal" look? How can a biased flame article be "formal"?
125 posted on 01/08/2003 5:20:15 PM PST by PatrioticAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
"Microsoft are the liberals.

By supporting them, you support abortion and gun control." Are you sure about that?

Microsoft Gun Club

126 posted on 01/08/2003 5:23:48 PM PST by PatrioticAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
P.S. Does YOUR company have a gun club???
127 posted on 01/08/2003 5:25:06 PM PST by PatrioticAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: PatrioticAmerican
We're too small. However, we specifically allow for CCW permits to be honored.

My point was that it's silly to claim that Apple is liberal, while Microsoft is some sort of conservative company. It's not. There are some of each in both companies, and the majority of both tend to be liberal.

BTW, http://www.geekswithguns.com/

128 posted on 01/08/2003 5:36:29 PM PST by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: TechJunkYard
6. Kodak cameras are compatible with Fuju film.

Just don't try to put Polaroid film in it, though.

129 posted on 01/08/2003 5:37:48 PM PST by CharacterCounts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
45,000 employees. You're right, I bet they have their fair chare of each.
130 posted on 01/08/2003 5:37:50 PM PST by PatrioticAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: chilepepper
My point exactly: the Office97 could not read the documents generated by Office2000

You know, when you add functionality to an application, it's only natural that downlevel versions won't be able to use that functionality. I'm sorry to hear about your friend's medical problems but it might have been a good plan to try interchanging documents. Here's a good article on the subject: http://www.ncs.ncsu.edu/ncs/FAQ/Windows2000/Sharing_Files_Between_Microsoft_Office_97_and_2000.htm
131 posted on 01/08/2003 6:56:51 PM PST by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Grut
"IIRC, IBM pretty much ignored it too; OS2 suffered from it's own maker's indifference as much as anything else.

From reading the history of the time, it appeasrs that one MAJOR mistake that IBM made was charging an arm and leg for the software development tools needed to program OS2 applications. At the same time, Microsoft was GIVING away similar tools for Windows to anyone who could totter up to their booth at COMDEX.

132 posted on 01/09/2003 7:11:48 AM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ProudGOP
ping
133 posted on 01/10/2003 6:43:02 PM PST by ProudGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-133 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson