Posted on 01/04/2003 5:28:38 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
Nah, that's not quite right.
The green line is exports as a % of GDP, so we're actually exporting more than we used to. (reflecting overall increased trade activity.) But the red line (imports) has increased even more dramaticly, and the difference between the two (the deficit -- blue line) is what is putting us down the crapper.
Not at all true. The real weath generation mechanism of capitalism is the ability of free people to use their minds to better the world through free trade and voluntary action. One hundred years ago people believed that the end was nigh because we were losing all our farms to industry.
We haven't starved.
Now job should be beneath us. The question is, do we as adults want to spend our time working for $15 to $20 dollar an hour full-time jobs with benefits, or $8 to $12 dollar part time jobs without benefits?
Service work = selling hamburgers and changing the bedsheet of foreign master.
That sounds nice. But it is obvious you have a globalist perspective here. I am for free people and free trade. And for that matter, bettering the world. However, I am for America first! And when manufacturing is moved to China, good paying American jobs are lost....and some Chinese person's standard of living has improved. A globalist...like yourself...says that's a good thing. I worry about the American folks who lost their job.....and the new wealth that went with it.
Manufacturing was the engine of growth. Why? Whoever had the R&D and the best manufacturing sold product to others. The R&D couldn't progress rapidly unless the manufacturing it supported developed the funds to execute it.
In the 1970s and 80s, large pharmaceutical houses used their funds to execute different policies. Those that spent a larger share of their profits to attract the best R&D brains, are today placing products on the shelves of pharmacies that see their parent organizations highly profitable. Those that didn't have little to offer today, to keep the income stream coming.
Even in certain service sector jobs, creativity equals higher income. The most profitable food services have an active R&D department. If our manufacturing leaves the US, we're in a world of hurt in many important areas.
This is not about class distinction. The fact is that service jobs tend to be low paying. Service jobs are filling the void left by higher paying manufacturing jobs. What does a checker at Walmart make...$8 dollars/hr? What did a mill worker make...$25 dollars/hr.? Which one would give a young father the better opportunity to house and feed his family??
One hundred years ago, the federal government wasn't confiscating half your income in order to:
1) make it more difficult for local businesses to operate, and
2) send it overseas to our competitors.
One hundred years ago, a bunch of globalist, NWO psychopathic freaks weren't running our government.
It hasn't.
The following data is from:
U.S. Department of Labor
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Consumer Price Index
All Urban Consumers - (CPI-U)
U.S. city average
All items
1982-84=100
1930 = 17
1940 = 14
1950 = 24
1960 = 30
1970 = 39
1980 = 82
1990 = 124
2000 = 167
1971 marks the beginning of the "free trade" era. The CPI has gone up since then at a nearly exponential rate (sorry I can't provide a graph of the data).
Free trade is not free.
Regards
J.R.
I think that was true in the past - just as agriculture was before it. But now everybody can manufacture everything - there's not a lot of money in it anymore - just a lot of overcapacity. It was a lot better (at least for us) when most of the world's industrial power was devastated by 2 world wars. Now we have to compete with the rest of the world.
Well they don't necessarily have to buy T-bills, and they're certainly free to spend or exchange it with whomever they want for whatever they want. But it's still basicly our paper IOUs that they're using and sooner or later those IOUs would have to come back to us for redemption. Now one of the things that happens with so many IOUs floating around out there is that "the full faith and credit of the United States" eventually becomes worth less. For us, that is bad because everything we buy as consumers (imported) will wind up costing more. For them, it is good because everything we sell to them will seem cheaper. Good for exports, I suppose, but (in the extreme) what if we're no longer making anything? I suppose maybe we could sell them OUR aircraft carriers to redeem those IOUs. Or we can sell them Alaska along with the Alaskan oil.
Granted, I'm exagerating (I hope) to illustrate the example. But it still boils down to the same old globalist mantra of Americans becoming more "competitive" means we have to work harder and harder for lesser and lesser until we reach some kind of equilibrium with the developing nations.
Let's try to avoid truth here. LOL Nice one.
I'm hedging my bets, because there are plenty of once-civilized corners of the world that are now bombed out hell holes (remember the Sarajevo Olympics in '84? It was a beautiful city that reminded me of my home town in Tennessee. Most recently it was depicted in the movie Behind Enemy Lines as "just another Beiruit".)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.