Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ancient_geezer
Allow me to correct a misconception you seem to have about one of my posts:

Despite all your straw "reasons", if judges ruled against the income tax, government funding would go away.

should read:

Despite all your straw "reasons", if judges ruled against the income tax, government funding from the income tax would go away.

I guess I thought that such an outcome was a foregone conclusion, but you seem to need it spelled out...

18 posted on 01/05/2003 7:40:32 PM PST by an amused spectator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: an amused spectator
And government funding would be replaced by another tax paying the judges in any case. Hence your entire diatribe about judges conflict of intrest goes down the drain.
19 posted on 01/06/2003 4:34:03 AM PST by ancient_geezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson