Which back taxes, penalties and interest are ruled upon by people whose paychecks come directly from said back taxes, penalties and interest, just like the old English vice-admiralty courts. ;-)
Notice, in both evaluations exactly the same result will be obtained from the Courts.
Furthermore:
1) Federal judges are appointed for life, and good behaviour. Their pay cannot be taken away from them.
2) Federal judges have ruled their pay is subject to income tax, though at any time they could rule otherwise if they so desired and believed otherwise.
3) It would be in the personal and financial interest for the courts to rule that the income tax is unconstitutional and illegal. In so doing the law would be void, the IRS which is authorised under that law would ceased to exist or have power over the people or the courts.
4) Judges are ruling against there own personal interest in support the income tax against you in the courtroom. For if it did not apply to you, it cannot apply to them.
Something is lacking in your analysis and it is called reason and credibility. It does not pass the test of Occum's razor, nor the laugh test.
Your "analysis", that is. We had a Civil War in this country over the prior funding of the federal government (tariffs). Despite all your straw "reasons", if judges ruled against the income tax, government funding would go away and would have to be replaced under the bright light of public scrutiny. That would be an amusing spectacle!
Whether you like it or not, judges get paid from tax dollars. They rule on tax cases. Therefore, they have an inherent conflict-of-interest. Occam's razor, in its simplest form.
==========================
Oh, and you can drop your usual "cut and paste argument" tactics.
I never posted anything remotely resembling "If that were true, the protestation that taxes do not apply to you is non-sence. For those judges will be certain to make the tax law apply to you". This is a non-sequitur on your part.
I merely pointed out, correctly, that the judges are hopelessly comprised by a massive conflict-of-interest in this matter, and their "rulings" on tax cases are phony. Period.