Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breakthrough Brings Laser Light To New Regions Of The Spectrum
Science Daily | National Science Foundation ^ | 2 Jan 2003

Posted on 01/02/2003 5:19:28 PM PST by sourcery

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 01/02/2003 5:19:28 PM PST by sourcery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: farmfriend; A tall man in a cowboy hat; Libertarianize the GOP; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...
FYI
2 posted on 01/02/2003 5:20:33 PM PST by sourcery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
But I wanna know when the Pink Floydian application is ready...see you on the dark side of the moon.
3 posted on 01/02/2003 5:22:52 PM PST by Benrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *tech_index
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
4 posted on 01/02/2003 5:23:08 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
The achievement is based on a new structure called a "waveguide,"

Sigh.....

5 posted on 01/02/2003 5:24:43 PM PST by AdamSelene235
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdamSelene235
"The achievement is based on a new structure called a 'waveguide,'"

Sigh.....

If something first discovered in 1894 qualifies as "new", I wonder how far back we'd have to go before the reporter would describe it as "old".

6 posted on 01/02/2003 5:34:16 PM PST by Dan Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
The Colorado group hopes to extend the beam's range into what scientists call the "water-window" -- the region of the spectrum below 4 nanometers where the light is perfect for imaging biological structures. Producing a beam in this region would allow the researchers to build a small microscope for imaging living tissues on a desktop or for viewing objects at the nanoscale.

Although it's not like this, we're getting a new Leitz confocal microscope that will be able to use 10 fluors simultaneously and be able to distinguish between the overlapping wavelengths of FITC, GFP, and YFP in the same sample. It'll be so cool to tag more than three proteins in a cell at a time.
7 posted on 01/02/2003 5:40:54 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro; jennyp; Junior; longshadow; *crevo_list; RadioAstronomer; Scully; Piltdown_Woman; ...
Laser breakthrough ping.

[This ping list for the evolution -- not creationism -- side of evolution threads, and sometimes for other science topics. To be included, or dropped, let me know via freepmail.]

8 posted on 01/02/2003 5:46:00 PM PST by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dan Day
If something first discovered in 1894 qualifies as "new", I wonder how far back we'd have to go before the reporter would describe it as "old".

Fire?

9 posted on 01/02/2003 5:47:54 PM PST by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dan Day
Ask any microwave technician about tuning wave guides
10 posted on 01/02/2003 5:52:19 PM PST by clamper1797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dan Day
If something first discovered in 1894 qualifies as "new", I wonder how far back we'd have to go before the reporter would describe it as "old".

Fuel cells are reported about as "new" technology, even though they were also invented in the mid 1800s. As someone else pointed out, we may have to go back to fire to get them to call it an old technology.

I was apprehensive, that the thread would already be full of the anti-government types whining about this "waste of our tax dollars." The research was NSF funded. Oh the unConstituitional horror. (/sarcasm)

11 posted on 01/02/2003 5:54:57 PM PST by Chemist_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
The new beam has peak powers approaching a megawatt and produces nanometer-scale light waves, yet the entire apparatus fits on a moderately sized table.

Weapons potential? sounds like an awful lot of power in a little package....
12 posted on 01/02/2003 5:58:49 PM PST by Kozak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
a new structure called a "waveguide,"

LOL!

13 posted on 01/02/2003 5:59:29 PM PST by Yeti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aruanan; Sparta; Mathlete; grundle; beckett; billorites; One More Time; Dominic Harr; ...
Whatcha mean there?

I suppose this would help with smaller circuits too, right?

14 posted on 01/02/2003 6:00:43 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Yeti; All
ok, I guess i should have read the rest of the article and the other replies before posting.
15 posted on 01/02/2003 6:01:10 PM PST by Yeti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Photonic Bandgap Placemarker
16 posted on 01/02/2003 6:16:24 PM PST by BMCDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kozak
Weapons potential?

Not likely based on the information here. The key is the phrase "peak power." Since this is a pulsed laser on a femtosecond time scale, it is possible to have enormous peak power but very low average power. How long is the pulse and what is the pulse frequency? One must answer these questions to know how effective it might be as a weapon. I've worked with a "nitrogen laser" pumped tunable dye laser. The pulse durations were on the nanosecond time scale, and peak powers of 100's of kilowatts could be achieved. Average power, however, was in milliwatts, as the laser was "off" most of the time. Very good for doing careful spectroscopy, chemistry, or microscopy, not good for bringing down ICBM's.

17 posted on 01/02/2003 6:19:19 PM PST by Faraday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AdamSelene235
Sigh.....

Well, maybe they cater to those who might confuse the following text with the image.

beams by firing a femtosecond laser through the gas-filled waveguide.

It is a gas-filled guide of some sort.

18 posted on 01/02/2003 6:27:57 PM PST by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dan Day
Actually photonic bandgap structures aren't that old.
If you want you can do a web search for "Eli Yablonovitch" and "PBG".

Also, you may have a look at these links:
http://www.fibre-optics.hw.ac.uk/Projects/mat16.htm
http://www.el.utwente.nl/tdm/ldg/research/pc_dev/pc_dev.htm

19 posted on 01/02/2003 6:28:30 PM PST by BMCDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
Moore's Law marches on as always.

(Cole's Law drips on your shirtfront.)
20 posted on 01/02/2003 6:31:27 PM PST by Atlas Sneezed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson