Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/02/2003 5:57:08 AM PST by Lorenb420
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Great Dane; liliana; Alberta's Child; Entropy Squared; Rightwing Canuck; Loyalist; canuckwest; ...
ping
2 posted on 01/02/2003 5:58:52 AM PST by Lorenb420
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorenb420
Hmmm. Pakistani chemist and Islamic scholar. Refuses to be fingerprinted or photographed. Known critic of US policies. Put this bozo on the list for deeper investigation.
3 posted on 01/02/2003 6:24:24 AM PST by per loin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorenb420
"A Canadian is a Canadian for all purposes..."

But a Panatella is a cigar.

Boo hoo, Muzaffar.

4 posted on 01/02/2003 6:27:52 AM PST by billorites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorenb420
And the Islamofascist Muzaffar Iqbal can just stay out of the united States. I love it when his fellow muslim countrymen who would install a tyrannical police state in a heart beat, and who are presently hatching plots to murder hundreds of thousands of innocent people to accomplish this mission whines and complains when the victim to be takes precautions like simply asking people to confirm their identification.

Perhaps this radical isn't aware of the loss of personal privacy the typical american citizen experiences every April 15th or in the process of securing a simple driver's license. Good grief, many banks now require fingerprints in order to cash a check! This terrorist sympathsizer is trying to undermine the feeble security system that exists now by trying to make us feel guilty because we don't trust Muslims that hate America especially those who demand the "right" to enter this country anonymously.

If I were in charge of the INS, this joker would be on a terrorist watch list and would only see the united States through photographs.

5 posted on 01/02/2003 6:28:02 AM PST by Dr Warmoose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorenb420
Sounds like a good start to me.
7 posted on 01/02/2003 6:29:36 AM PST by valkyrieanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorenb420

Celshader.com

10 posted on 01/02/2003 6:37:22 AM PST by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorenb420
"It is a complete code of apartheid based on race, religion and country of origin." <p? Yyyyyyyup. Don't like it? Stay the hell out.
11 posted on 01/02/2003 6:38:50 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorenb420
I lived in a border town and often crossed into canada to visit friends. The way canadians at the border treat American visitors should alarm their chambers of commerce. This muslim terrorist should be allowed in and then arrested.
12 posted on 01/02/2003 6:50:09 AM PST by RWG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorenb420
12/11/2002 - Political - Article Ref: IV0212-1804
By: Dr. Muzaffar Iqbal
Iviews* -




Thank you, President Bush for your Eid greetings, we are indeed greatly indebted. And thank you for telling us, one more time, that your new war is not against Islam and Muslims. It was time that you reminded us that we should not take the B-52 bombers showering bombs on our cities so personally. Indeed, the six Iraqis who died on the first day of December are not to be counted among the dead; they were illegal combatants, working in an oil factory.

As Muslims, we are grateful to you for all the food packages that were sent down from the Afghan skies during the last year. Had we been the children of Israel, it would have reminded us of our great past when Manna and Salva was sent down by God. Let me assure you, Mr. President, American peanut butter tastes so good that our Afghan children became so keen to pick up the food packages that they could not even distinguish between the food packages and thousands of canister bombs that your B-52 bombers left behind in their wasteland. But, of course, it was their bad luck; we will just add them to the list of collateral damage. That way, we will not have to go through the tedious ritual of calculating the number of dead.

I am sorry to hear that things are not going well back home. Some unpatriotic Americans have started to ask questions about your war of terror, excuse me, war on terror. They ask for results for the 40 billion dollars you so graciously and hurriedly sanctioned for the great war. That little audio cassette that recently surfaced at the Al-Jazeera did not help much, I suppose. Although you have the Al-Jazeera's Kabul correspondent firmly locked up in a cage at camp X-ray (and thank God, the international union of journalists has not made a peep about him), this little island of a network keeps coming up with trouble after trouble.

You were, however, more successful with Herta Daeubler-Gmelin, the German Justice Minister who so rudely compared your new war policies to that of Adolf Hitler; thank goodness, she was quickly sacked by Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder for poisoning the relations. I must also congratulate you on quickly getting rid of Mme. Francoise Ducros, the Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chretien's Director of Communications, who so ungratefully called you a moron despite all the soft lumber that American companies so cheaply buy from Canada in order to help their economy.

Mr. President, it is heartening to know that the new Department of Homeland Security is finally off to a grand start. With an operational budget of $37.5 billion and nearly 170,000 federal employees, it should keep the homeland secure. Just let no American walk out of your great country without the protection of pilot-less drones for streets of the world have become very dangerous for them.

I hope that with your ambassador in London so ardently standing behind you in your war after war, it should not be difficult to soon control all the unruly streets. Whatever happened the other day in Amman should never be allowed to happen again. I think it would not be a bad idea to send a little congratulatory note to your distant relative in Amman for taking care of the matter so promptly. I hear the little town of Mann is also grateful to you for bringing all the world attention to this tribal region. The price those little rabbles had to pay was not much, I suppose, compared to what the Afghans have paid. It was merely a double digit number that they lost. But we will not call it war against Muslims; after all, it was their own king whose army was doing the job.

Mr. President, in your Eid greetings, you have rightly told us that the new year is full of promises. We look forward to the new ventures. Afghanistan is indeed becoming a little too dull and although great news is in store regarding Iraq, Hans Blix and his team of inspectors are taking too long. Please hurry up or else the current rating will start to go down and you know very well how difficult it is to whip up the hysteria once it has subsided.

You know that anthrax cannot be used again to create fear. (By the way, the little leak leading to the US military was plugged very well and I sincerely hope that all patriotic Americans will remember never to ask any questions about anthrax.) So, what are we going to do next time? How would you generate new waves of fear? I suppose those little Napoleons in thousands of homeland security offices would come up with something. Perhaps, you should ask them to start cooking something like the danger of a bio-engineered mosquito bringing a deadly virus. That would be something!

It is my sincere hope, Mr President, that in the new year, you will not be so lenient with men who keep bothering you with their silly questions about Afghanistan. I was shocked to read a report by one Robert Fisk who sketched a graphic picture of little children being blown up in the deserts of Khost. He also had the nerve to draw world attention to the endless queue of mutilated civilians sitting outside the hospital in Herat, hoping to get an artificial leg. Likewise, people who keep mentioning international laws, protocols and agreements should be stopped from reminding the world that in your war of terror (excuse my slip again, Mr. President), you have not even spared ambassadors. No one has the right to remind the world that Ambassador Mullah Zaeef is still locked up in a cage in Camp X-ray.

I am glad to know that early in 2003, Germans will take charge of the Afghan ordeal. It would be their boys who would risk their lives for this grand show which, we all know, will only last for as long as money keeps coming. But I am afraid, Afghans are rather notorious for their tenacity. There is little hope that what the Soviet Union could not achieve with 140,000 men, we can achieve without large-scale disasters soon erupting all over this unruly land. Those who keep saying that the Afghan adventure is headed for disaster should all be locked up with the "illegal combatants". (By the way, that was an excellent invention for which its inventor should be amply rewarded.)

That reminds me to say that events like the appearance of those four pictures of C-130 planes carrying their human cargo to Camp X-ray should not be allowed to happen again. They do bring the specter of war crimes being launched in some court, somewhere in the world although you have rightly declined to sign the international charter which would put the American soldiers in risk. But the images of those shackled men, which recently flashed on millions of computer screens around the world, was not nice, to say the least.

I am also sad to know that some Edward Saids are still around. They keep talking about an impossible linkage: the suffering of Palestinians, so carefully crafted by a 2.1 billion dollar annual aid to Israel and numerous supplements. They have maps, numbers and pictures which they keep showing to the world. The appearance of a new great wall here, barbed fences there, burned olive orchards, destroyed homes, pieces of dead bodies scattered on streets, made-in-America gun ships and helicopters bombing the refugee camps. Of course, your war is not against Muslims and certainly there is no link between the suffering of Palestinians and the catastrophes Americans continue to experience abroad. No, the world should accept the verdict of your "man of peace" who looks forward to his new term which will complete the task of fortification of Israel.

And finally, let me close by thanking you, once again, Mr. President, for the opportunity you so graciously provided to some of our Muslim brothers and sisters to come and visit you and Laura at the White House at the beginning of the month of Ramadan. That great occasion will always be remembered by them and their children and their children. They are eternally grateful to you and Laura. I am sure you also value their friendship because they the harbingers of an intellectual northern alliance you so desperately need at this time. With all the best wishes for your new year adventures I am, yours sincerely.

Dr Muzaffar Iqbal is a freelance writer
muzaffar_i@hotmail.com


15 posted on 01/02/2003 7:05:17 AM PST by Howie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorenb420
the jerk is a pakistani...keep him out...
20 posted on 01/02/2003 7:20:05 AM PST by Bill Davis FR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorenb420
The malevolence of the left, particularly in Canada, shouldn't be doubted. Recall that the same people up in arms now about border security actually being taken seriously were the ones who were crying to high heaven last year that we should address terrorism as a police matter and not a military matter. (They were also the same ones warning about the reckless, dangerous, and futile efforts to confront the Taliban in the "graveyard of invaders" too.) But if we do address terrorism as a police matter, and we hear nothing but more complaining. We can't do this, we can't do that, we certainly can't investigate any Middle Easterners.

What does it matter, they think, if another staggering mass murder occurs on our soil? That's our problem, and has nothing to do with the "requirement" that we treat Middle Eastern chemists just like everyone else. It's our fault anyway we are attacked, after all.

I don't know about the rest of you but I am sick to high heaven of the self-loathing, America loathing, contemptible, craven, and weak minded left.

21 posted on 01/02/2003 7:20:35 AM PST by Timm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorenb420
it is a question of our basic rights being violated

Since when is unimpeded entry to the US a "basic human right"? Yesterday I sat in the "US-bound" lanes on the Ambassador Bridge for almost 2 hours. I flipped on the radio and happened to hear that border security had been ramped up all weekend. Well, I was very glad to hear it.

One thing that I noticed during my weekend in Toronto, is that I never saw the Maple Leaf flag displayed by any private home, or even any businesses (except for the Windsor casino) the way that the Stars & Stripes is displayed here.

24 posted on 01/02/2003 7:41:19 AM PST by Alouette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorenb420
The way I see it, we have one of 3 options. We can cave to the whining and not worry about protecting our borders from foreign terrorists, particularly of mideastern descent and go with being politically correct instead of sensible so's not to offend anybody. We can respond to the whining of the mideasterners by subjecting ALL Canadians to the same scrutiny so the whiners won't feel singled out. Or we can do what WE need to do to protect OUR country and tell the whiners if they don't like it, then stay the h*ll out. Nobody is forcing them to come here.

Which one is right? It seems obvious to me. Which route will we take? Probably the first.

I am getting to the point that I judge the effectiveness of a policy by how loud the opposition squeals. The louder they squeal, the more likely it is to be an effective policy. Unfortunately, the louder they squeal, the more likely it is that we will back off. Kinda reminds me of parents who give in to children throwing a temper tantrum who have learned that if they scream loud enough they get their way.

25 posted on 01/02/2003 8:17:12 AM PST by sweetliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorenb420
I support this policy 110%. I only wish it could be used at all border crossings.
29 posted on 01/02/2003 11:55:23 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson