Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Edwards Announces White House Run
AP | 1/02/03 | REBECCA MILLER

Posted on 01/01/2003 11:16:22 PM PST by kattracks

RALEIGH, N.C., Jan 02, 2003 (AP Online via COMTEX) -- Democratic Sen. John Edwards will run for president in 2004, telling guests at a party at his home Wednesday he will form an exploratory committee.

The first-term senator from North Carolina told about 200 friends he will announce his plans publicly Thursday, said Walter Dellinger, a former U.S. solicitor general who attended the New Year's Day party.

Edwards' guests gathered in his back yard while the senator thanked them for their support during his time in the Senate and in "what I'm going to do next."

As he spoke, a loud cheer went up.

"John was talking about where he wants to lead the country," Ed Turlington, a former state Democratic party executive director, said afterward in describing the announcement. "He asked for our support. Our answer was yes."

Edwards' announcement gives him the jump on several of his colleagues in Congress who are also expected to join the Democratic field in 2004.

Vermont Gov. Howard Dean and Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry are already running, and associates expect Missouri Rep. Dick Gephardt to announce he's running within the next week.

Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman is leaning toward a run, though he hasn't set a timetable for his decision. Senate Democratic leader Tom Daschle is still talking with supporters with a plan to decide by mid-January, and Florida Sen. Bob Graham has said he will decide this month.

Edwards, 49, a millionaire former trial lawyer, has spent months making the rounds at Democratic functions in Iowa, New Hampshire and elsewhere.

Standing with his youngest children, 2-year-old son Jack and 4-year-old Emma Claire, Edwards said before the party started that his family was uppermost in his mind as he considered whether to run.

"I've been thinking about North Carolina and the nation and what effect it's going to have on my family," he said.

He is scheduled to appear on NBC's "Today" show Thursday morning to make his announcement official. He also has two fund-raisers scheduled for Saturday in Raleigh.

Edwards would be up for Senate re-election in 2004, a factor that had to be weighed in making a decision on the presidential race.

Edwards' move toward a run has drawn a lot of attention. He was an early hit with Democratic activists who saw him as telegenic and able to connect with voters.

The last three Democratic presidents - Lyndon Johnson of Texas, Jimmy Carter of Georgia and Bill Clinton of Arkansas - have been from the South.

Edwards grew up as the son of a textile mill employee, born in South Carolina but spending his teenage years in Robbins, N.C. He became a successful trial lawyer in Raleigh, winning personal injury cases against big companies and amassing a fortune of $14 million.

---

Associated Press writers Ron Fournier in Washington and Scott Mooneyham in Raleigh contributed to this report.

---

On the Net:

Edwards' Senate Web site: http://edwards.senate.gov

By REBECCA MILLER Associated Press Writer

Copyright 2003 Associated Press, All rights reserved





TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: edwardswatch; investingstocks; moose; northcarolina; oldnorthstate; unhelpful
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-190 next last
To: No Dems 2004
"Being the slick, pretty boy won't buy him the presidency -- people want substance."

People want substances to abuse - hey, Clinton was elected having no substance, that was abuse.

Beware of Blinkey Edwards and the Democratic recounters - one vote is more than enough for him to win....

81 posted on 01/02/2003 8:01:36 AM PST by azhenfud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day

82 posted on 01/02/2003 8:05:03 AM PST by Henchster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: chimera
but my fear is that '04 is shaping up as a '92 replay,

No way will sinator hillary! let ANY demonrat occupy the WH before she has her shot. No way.

There is no viable third party to siphon votes away from President Bush, either. mclame's health won't allow him to challenge Bush, even though his ego may want to.

83 posted on 01/02/2003 8:06:15 AM PST by mombonn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: wotan
Your correct. It was obvious in his news conference the he is playing on just what the right feels it is lacking. Border patrol, immigration and the desire shown after 9/11 that ordinary Americans wanted to man civil patrols to help protect our infrastructure, it didn't happen and he is playing on that.
84 posted on 01/02/2003 8:07:32 AM PST by snippy_about_it
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
bump for hillary...
85 posted on 01/02/2003 8:09:00 AM PST by Bill Davis FR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I am going to try to establish some type of survelience system at the 801 Steakhouse in DM. If he ever sets foot in there, we will know he has no interest in the 'Little People'.

*admitting I know my way around the bar area there,,, but I only eat there when I'm a guest ;>) *
86 posted on 01/02/2003 8:12:36 AM PST by Iowa Granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Henchster
Thank you sir! I love it.
87 posted on 01/02/2003 8:15:06 AM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
He declared that the clintons back Edwards and that he is considered a potential running mate for hillary.

Or vice-versa. The Clintons don't do anything that isn't of a calculating political nature. Hillary! may sense that the country "isn't ready" for her yet, and wouldn't mind at all being "the first woman VP" (really a co-President once again) for President Edwards for four or eight years. There's plenty of time for her when "the country is ready for a woman President". My guess is that if she throws her lot in with Edwards it will solidify the arousal-gapped female vote behind Edcwards to the tune of 70-75% or so.

I think his candidacy it taken lightly at our peril.

Very wise words indeed. We took Clinton lightly and all it got us was eight years of defeat and wandering in the wilderness on the WH front. Two years is a lifetime in politics and the victory that Bush and the 'Pubs wrought in '02 will be a distant memory, made moreso if the economy is still down in the dumps come then. Mark my words, the Rats are just prepping a pretty-boy empty suit and saddling up the white horse again for him to ride into town and "save" the country from the grasp of the "evil Republicans" and "greedy corporations". They'll trot out the corporate wongdoers as posterboys (i.e., "Kenny-boy")for Bush II, and the Republicans as beholden to Big Business, and the presstitutes will eat it up.

88 posted on 01/02/2003 8:22:26 AM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: mombonn
The GOP won't allow any viable candidate to go after Bush. No sense in it....they'll just get trounced in the primaries. 2008 is a whole 'nother story. But, that's a lifetime away, politcally.

I'd like to see Condi Rice in 2008. Aside from her qualifications, it'd be a real thumb in the eye to all the lib affirmative action proponents. Dunno if the country's ready for her yet, or not though. Electing someone who's a) a woman and b) black is a stretch for limited minds in both parties.

In 2004, there will be the usual 3rd party candidates......Buchanan, some green party idiot, etc etc etc. Whether any of them will be a viable contender for Conservative votes depends on how well GOP leaders reign in wildcards like McCain. I'd think that McCain would be everyone's worst nightmare because he steals votes from both sides of the aisle. He's also a raging egomaniac that shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a position of power....but the press will never see that. He just makes good copy.

89 posted on 01/02/2003 8:26:39 AM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
For sheer volume and effect, you just can't beat this photo, which personifies my feelings towards my Democrat NC Senator:


90 posted on 01/02/2003 8:29:10 AM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
She has been working on the weight for at least 2 years....

I always had the picture in my head of the two of them at the convention waving to the crowds and holding up their arms up in the air and her arm fat hitting John in the head!

She was really bad and it was more pronounced because he is very slight.

But two pregnancies in your forties will do that to you!
91 posted on 01/02/2003 8:34:08 AM PST by AlwaysLurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: AlwaysLurking
Here's to hoping I don't get pregnant in my forties. No doubt she'll get morning show mileage out of the weight loss.
92 posted on 01/02/2003 8:52:42 AM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
I successfully got thru my forties without a pregnancy! LOL! My claim to fame!!!

To be honest, I doubt that Mrs Edwards weight loss is ever mentioned....they moved away from NC and really no one saw her for about two years....there weren't even any photos of her! She was totally into those two new babies and funishing the new DC area multi-million dollar home! And of course, keeping up with the two other homes they own.....keeps a gal busy!
93 posted on 01/02/2003 9:02:54 AM PST by AlwaysLurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: chimera
I truly hope that the paranoia espoused by a surprisingly large number of Republicans will help produce President Bush's re-election. Karl Rove, I believe, is always very nervous and concerned about the President's re-election chances. I'm actually appreciative of this. After the historic mid-term election triumph, many Republicans quickly went back to the worrying board when they lost Louisiana. While I don't advocate worrying, I have been reassured to see their overconfidence evaporating.

One point I'd like to make. Last night, I watched a documentary that featured George Bush senior. My family and I were struck at how lame and weak-willed he was compared to his son. What many Republicans are forgetting is that George Bush senior really wasn't worth re-electing (though Bill Clinton wasn't either). But God forbid that I say that of George W. Bush (the incumbent Prez). Our current President Bush is more like Ronald Reagan than he is like his dad.
94 posted on 01/02/2003 9:22:46 AM PST by No Dems 2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: mwl1
"This ain't gonna be a replay of 1992. It's gonna be a replay of 1984. Reagan's recovery did not begin until November 1982, and his recession was much deeper. We have a tax cut in place, with more tax reductions to come in 2003."


I agree with you, but, please, don't be overconfident. I truly believe Bush will be re-elected, BUT we mustn't stop praying for him and doing what we can to help.
95 posted on 01/02/2003 9:31:31 AM PST by No Dems 2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: No Dems 2004
It is my belief that candidates for office should run scared. In politics, when you become complacent, you tend to lose. GW Bush needs to get out there and just hammer away at the Rats when the opportunity presents itself. Granted, he's got a lot on his plate, but one thing Clinton and the Rats did not lose sight of was the need to keep on the offensive. That went a long way towards keeping Clinton in office for eight years, even when things looked bleakest for him.

One point I'd like to make. Last night, I watched a documentary that featured George Bush senior. My family and I were struck at how lame and weak-willed he was compared to his son. What many Republicans are forgetting is that George Bush senior really wasn't worth re-electing (though Bill Clinton wasn't either). But God forbid that I say that of George W. Bush (the incumbent Prez). Our current President Bush is more like Ronald Reagan than he is like his dad.

George H. W. Bush is a good, decent, and honorable man. He made his fatal mistake by trusting the Rats at their word. The 'Pubs in Congress did this as well. I hope and pray that finally, once and for all, Bush Jr. and the 'Pubs will learn this one truth: never, ever trust a Rat. Any good thing Bush and the Republicans want to do they have to start out assuming that they'll have to do it themselves. If some Rats join them, fine, but still don't trust them because they're only looking out for themselves and their party, and everyone else be damned.

96 posted on 01/02/2003 9:34:37 AM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Snardius
Kennedy announced for president on this day in 1960. Coincidence? I think not.

Are you serious?? .. Oh Good Grief

97 posted on 01/02/2003 9:39:10 AM PST by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
She "is shaping up to be a hybrid of the past two first ladies, blending the Southern charm of Laura with the moxie of Hillary (she's whispered to be "the smarter one" in the marriage ...)."

Oh, please. Based on this morning's Today interview, it was obvious that Elizabeth Edwards is a dull, beaten-down congressional wife without a brain in her head. And someone, please, slap some makeup on this woman, she is hard on the eyes at 7 am.

98 posted on 01/02/2003 9:40:26 AM PST by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: rmvh
I hope you're in training, cuz them's fightin' words.
99 posted on 01/02/2003 9:48:52 AM PST by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: AlwaysLurking
I can not post pictures but check out the art the Raleigh News and Observer is using on all stories about Edwards....look like anyone we know?????

Either it's Donny Osmond or a Robert Kennedy ..


100 posted on 01/02/2003 9:49:51 AM PST by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-190 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson