Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Edwards Announces White House Run
AP | 1/02/03 | REBECCA MILLER

Posted on 01/01/2003 11:16:22 PM PST by kattracks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-190 next last

1 posted on 01/01/2003 11:16:22 PM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Edwards who? You don't mean that rookie air-head, ex-ambulance-chaser who still thinks Iowa is a separate country, do you? ;^)
2 posted on 01/01/2003 11:21:58 PM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
That's the one.
3 posted on 01/01/2003 11:23:01 PM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Figures. lol
4 posted on 01/01/2003 11:23:29 PM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

For Democrats, it seems, the bad news just keeps on coming:

Item 1) New Year celebrations went peaceful -- no terrorist attack on U.S. soil, depriving Dems of grist for the 'Bush-Isn't-Doing-Enough-ON-Homeland-Defense' mill. The newsies were, till 12:01 New Year's morning, almost giddy over prospects a group of as many as 19 Muslim extremists, who reportedly entered the country illegally through Canada, were poised to strike on New Year's day, handing Democrats a major issue.

Item 2) Tom Daschle has decided, and it's a go -- he's running for president. "Daschle," writes Adam Nagourney in this morning's New York Times, "has told associates that he is likely to run for president in 2004 and will create a presidential exploratory committee sometime this month." This, according to "Democrats close to Mr. Daschle."

Daschle, for those who might not be familiar with the name, is the outgoing Democrat Senate "Majority" Leader who led his party to overwhelming defeat in November's midterm elections, costing the Bush-haters control of the Senate. That, if my history is correct, is a first for first midterm elections. Republicans, I assure you, are 'bring-it-on' chortling this New Year's Day.


5 posted on 01/01/2003 11:28:07 PM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I love to see so many Senators up in 2004 running; Daschle, Edwards and Graham where the GOP has a better than even chance at the seat. This could be a monster year with 7 or so pickups if Boxer gets a challenge, Giuliani runs, Hollings retires, bin Murray goes down, REid goes down in NV and Huckabee runs in AR. There's a rumor that Nickles will step down and JC Watts will run.
6 posted on 01/01/2003 11:33:00 PM PST by byteback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: byteback
I can't wait for the backbiting to begin.
7 posted on 01/01/2003 11:35:23 PM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: byteback
The good thing is, with so many Senate Dems running for president, every criticism lobbed at the White House will be neutralized as purely political.
8 posted on 01/01/2003 11:40:03 PM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: byteback
Especially Bob Graham, whom the media loved to cite as an "authority" on intel. He now stands as no more than just another opportunist after Bush's job.
9 posted on 01/01/2003 11:41:51 PM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Standing with his youngest children, 2-year-old son Jack and 4-year-old Emma Claire, Edwards said before the party started that his family was uppermost in his mind as he considered whether to run.

Kind of reminds ya of JFK.. doesn't it

10 posted on 01/01/2003 11:49:01 PM PST by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
The good thing is, with so many Senate Dems running for president, every criticism lobbed at the White House will be neutralized as purely political.

That's kind of funny, really. I think you meant: "every criticism lobbed at the White House will be accorded extra credibility coming from the Next Leader of the Free World".

11 posted on 01/02/2003 12:04:40 AM PST by JohnnyZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Edwards! And He's a tobacco lawyer too! And such nice children! Wow!

(sound of crickets)

< sarcasm off >
12 posted on 01/02/2003 2:49:30 AM PST by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Don't underestimate Edwards. He is willing to advocate what it takes to win.

From his website (Dec. 18, 2002):

"Pointing to dramatic failures in stopping the September 11 terrorists from entering the country, Senator Edwards also proposed increasing the number of immigration, border patrol and state department consular officials by 10,000. He called for tripling funds for border control information technology, and condensing the confusing array of immigration documents."
Bush is going to be in big trouble if the economy is tanking in 2004, there is another big terrorist attack, and he's still dragging his feet on preventing illegal immigration.
13 posted on 01/02/2003 3:05:45 AM PST by wotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wotan
It looks like Edwards' pollsters have told him that he cannot win a Senate re-election in 2004 so he has nothing to loose by running for Prez. I'm guessing that the NC Democrats will give Bowles another shot at a Senate seat. It's too early to know who the Republicans will run for that seat, but if I had to guess, I think Congressman Richard Burr of Winston-Salem has the inside track at the Republican nomination for that seat.

It is interesting to note that this Senate Seat has changed hands everytime it has come open since the mid-1970's when Senator B. Everett Jordon retired.

14 posted on 01/02/2003 3:38:13 AM PST by Tom D.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Edwards gives me flashbacks. I swear to God he has Glen Campbell's 1969 hair.
15 posted on 01/02/2003 3:41:06 AM PST by ihatemyalarmclock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Personally, while I'm not overconfident for the GOP, I don't think that John Edwards has got what it takes. He's radically liberal on issues like abortion (he even opposes the partial birth abortion ban) and homosexuality, while at the same time claiming to be "moderate". Recent surveys that I've heard of have suggested that he's not even all that popular in his native NC. Don't forget what happened to Max Cleland who had pretty much the same record as Edwards. Being the slick, pretty boy won't buy him the presidency -- people want substance.

By the way, any more word on Bob Graham's potential candidacy?
16 posted on 01/02/2003 3:55:39 AM PST by No Dems 2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wotan
"Don't underestimate Edwards. He is willing to advocate what it takes to win."

I must agree with your assertion that we must not be overconfident of President Bush winning re-election. I always pray that he'll remain aware that he's human and mustn't think he's invincible.

But let's not fear the Democrats either. I fully expect the Democrats to do everything they feel they can to win, and we may even feel vulnerable sometimes. But John Edwards and all the other Democrats planning to run are not good men, and they can't pretend to be either.

So let's have faith and pray for the best for our nation.
17 posted on 01/02/2003 4:05:25 AM PST by No Dems 2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
>>4-year-old Emma Claire,<<

who has asked her parents to change her name to Caroline...

18 posted on 01/02/2003 4:06:07 AM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Kind of reminds ya of JFK.. doesn't it

Kennedy announced for president on this day in 1960. Coincidence? I think not.

19 posted on 01/02/2003 4:10:00 AM PST by Snardius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"He became a successful trial lawyer in Raleigh, winning personal injury cases against big companies and amassing a fortune of $14 million."

IOW, he's an opportunistic parasite.
20 posted on 01/02/2003 4:12:17 AM PST by Snardius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-190 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson