As mentioned earlier, the world's become a lot smaller and threats exist today that the Founders couldn't have imagined. They knew that in their day a credible foreign menace would have to cross a vast ocean with relatively immense resources to subdue and take America. Today, a "rogue nation" that could might launch a single ICBM at one of our major cities with potentially devestating consequences to the entire country.
The Founders contemplated everything when they drafted the Constitution. The Constitution's limitations on federal government needed to be amendable to deal with future events, unforeseeable at the time.
Circumstances have changed a lot since the founding and federal policy has changed to deal with the change, as the Founders intended. Social programs and redistribution of wealth, which are now such a priority of government, were expressly prohibited by the Constitution and for very good reason. We're within our rights to oppose what's happening on this front and we're doing it. Re-posturing against changing international threats the Founders would have considered wise and necessary.
I'm with you in detesting neo-globalism. However, when foreign enemies (to date, Islamists, but other enemies as well) have the means and have communicated the desire to attack us from a great distance (and now we've been attacked), probably we should do something about it.
We'd all love nothing more than to remain isolated from the insanity of the wide world. The realities of today simply won't allow it if we wish to remain free and prosperous.
Happy New Year!