Replies

The article tars everybody against an Iraqi war as in league with commie nutsacks like the WWP.

Communists and their "progressive" ilk are against a war with Iraq.

That isn't the question. The question is whether it's right or wrong, not the commies' viewpoint.

You've posted a thought provoking article, and I thank you for it.

My point is, if we're going to give up on hanging Osama from the nearest light pole, we should really consider if we want an aggressive war or not. By aggressive, I mean an aggresive war on people where we're lacking evidence of an attack on us.

Personally, I'm very much in favor of killing all those who've attacked us. Clearly, Bin Ladin and his buddies.

Saddam is a horrible guy. But compared to Kim Il Sung and his progeny there's no comparison in depth of evil.

Sorry, I'm not credulous. Why Iraq? Why now? Why not North Korea?

I served in South Korea. The north Koreans are rabid and evil nutsacks. They're also a much tougher target. Are we attacking Saddam (sh*t be upon him) because he's an easier target, while we ignore the extreme evil in North Korea?

Inquiring minds want to know.

To the punks who want to accuse me of being un-American, this voluntary US Army veteran says "Think again."

Thoughtful comments and thank you for your service.

I am for the Iraq war. You are obviously yet to be convinced.

The merits of the war (as far as this particular discussion go) are beside the point. My only point in posting the article and I think the author's point in writing it was to merely show that ANSWER and IAC are fronting for WWP. And WWP is a hardcore, oldline, stalinist communist organization.

I have no problem debating the merits of the impending war, which I think basically go to whether or not you trust the current administration. But that is really a one off issue, as far as this article is concerned, IMO.

Thanks again, for your service.

"The article tars everybody against an Iraqi war as in league with commie nutsacks like the WWP."

No. It most assuredly does not.

The article is specifically designed to separate the WWP nutballs from those who are against war on Iraq for more defensible reasons (as Corn himself is).

Corn is an anti-war leftist (The Nation magazine), who rightly wants no association with the WWP.