Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stanz
The leg proportions don't figure. Why do they both have similar-sized femurs while the tibias are much smaller in Neanderthal?

It's not as if we're examining an aircraft or something else which has been deliberately designed. The Neanderthal legs were apparently adequate for survival, so their structure persevered through the generations. Eventually, nature's blundering system of mutation produced a better model -- our own wonderful selves -- and the days of the Neanderthal were numbered.

Our own "design" isn't exactly optimal. Lots of humans suffer from bad backs, dental problems, poor vision, allergies, etc. Very few of us are models of athletic perfection. But our species seems adequate for survival, so here we are. In due course, our technology may permit us to "improve" on our design. That should be interesting.

55 posted on 01/01/2003 8:18:22 AM PST by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: PatrickHenry
Everything in Nature evolves for a reason.While our own structure isn't perfect,there are obvious traits which have been retained and refined. There is no fossil or living hominid that has a femur as large in relation to the tibia as this Neanderthal model. Was it just convenient in piecing together this specimen? If not and it was intentionally presented this way, what would be the evolutionary advantage? It would be interesting to find a complete Neanderthal skeleton and I hold out hope that this happens.
93 posted on 01/01/2003 5:50:00 PM PST by stanz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson