Replies

Pro-choice "conservatives" are not conservatives. They are merely Party Members. Party uber alles. They turn with the wind. They are the first to roll over for the liberals if they think it "helps" the Party.

The Bushbots are a funny lot. If Bush says "yes", they all agree 100%. If he changes his mind and says "No", they agree to that 100% too.

Pro-choice "conservatives" are not conservatives. They are merely Party Members. Party uber alles.

Nice try, but no stogie. I could slur you the same way, Hank, by saying that pro-judicial activism "conservatives" are no conservatives at all. Reality, as usual, is far more complicated than you or I acknowledge here. You can point at the Texas case decided by Gonzales and scream that he's pro-abort - yet should he engage in judicial activism to overturn a law BASED UPON HIS PERSONAL VIEWS? That is the road to judicial tyranny, IMO.

So why don't you turn down the inane Bushbot rhetoric and back up your position with facts and reason instead of slurs and emotions.

I invite everyone to look at your replies. You are not interested in the facts of the ONE case that Gonzales was in conflict with pro-life opinion, which has been explained.

You also are not interested in the fact that Roe-vs. Wade cannot be overturned by judicial decree from one judge, and are also apparently unaware that even the reversal of Roe vs. Wade would not overturn abortion, but merely send the decision back to the states. While we can assume that a few states like Louisiana and Utah would outlaw abortion, most state legislatures would not do so.

So, what I see here is an attempt to both smear Alberto Gonzales either because he is Hispanic or because he is the next target in the ever shriller anti-Bush rhetoric that has become all too common on this forum.

As most all readers know, I am a Bush suporter since the primaries. Do I agree on everything? No. I really, REALLY wish we had held out for school voutures. HOWEVER, unlike some people on this forum, I do not demand that everything go my way, 100%, or I will launch into a tirade.

So, what is your point in continuing to misrepresent Gonzales and pretending that you don't understand the explanations that several people have given you? Do you simply want to trash everything Bush does? Do you harbor a grudge against Gonzales? Or are you simply in the business of causing arguments in general?