Agreed, but anyone going along with the accumulated FedCreep to date falls short of the mark of a "strict constructionist."
Perhaps "light constructionist" is a better term?
Are we talkin' about judges or salad dressings? :^)
I think light constructionist is probably what we would get in the short term, as someone adhering to even that limited viewpoint would be considered as some kind of right-wing neanderthal by the press and a goodly quantity of the American electorate. Face it, folks with our views just ain't that common anymore, so if I had to venture a guess, a light constructionist is what we would get. However, if we get six of them on the bench, methinks they could gain weight in a hurry...