Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Riyadh denies allowing US use of bases
The Times of India ^ | December 30 2002 | AFP

Posted on 12/30/2002 7:16:41 AM PST by knighthawk

RIYADH: A senior Saudi official denied reports of a secret promise by Riyadh to make its airspace and bases available for use by the United States in the event of war against Iraq, in remarks published on Monday.

"This report is untrue. The kingdom's position on this issue has been very clear from the start," Deputy Defence Minister Prince Abdulrahman bin Abdul Aziz told Okaz daily.

The New York Times on Sunday quoted senior US military officials as saying Riyadh would make its airspace, air bases and an important operations center available to the United States in a possible war with Iraq.

Saudi Arabia was the main staging area for American forces in the 1991 Gulf war, but conflicting public statements by top Saudi officials over the past several months have cast doubt on Saudi Arabia's assistance against Iraq.

American commanders told the Times they have been given private assurances in recent weeks that they will be allowed to run an air war against Iraq from a sophisticated command centre at Prince Sultan Air Base outside Riyadh, Saudi Arabia's capital- the same command post that ran the air campaign in Afghanistan.

They said refuelling, reconnaissance, surveillance and cargo planes would be allowed to fly from Saudi bases, using Saudi airspace on the way to missions in or near Iraq.

They also expressed confidence that the Saudis would ultimately allow attack missions, which are more politically sensitive, to be flown from their soil.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bases; iraq; riyadh; saudiarabia; usstrikes

1 posted on 12/30/2002 7:16:41 AM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; rebdov; Nix 2; green lantern; BeOSUser; Brad's Gramma; dreadme; keri; Turk2; ...
Ping
2 posted on 12/30/2002 7:17:31 AM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Do they or don't they. This is getting as bad as defining "is".
3 posted on 12/30/2002 7:27:48 AM PST by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: meenie
I'm beginning to think that only their turban (hair)-dresser knows for sure!
4 posted on 12/30/2002 7:31:24 AM PST by NordP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Most uncomfortable position they're in, it would appear.

"Don't throw Scuds our way, please? We're neutral!! < wink-wink >

5 posted on 12/30/2002 7:31:49 AM PST by DCPatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meenie
Saudi Arabia is in a position that reminds me of the
Honeymooner episode where Norton really gets in hot water
regarding his mother-in-law. Standing in front of Ralph and
Trixie, he says, turning to Ralph "My mother-in-law is the
MEANEST, AWFULLEST ..." and then turning to Trixie: "...
WONDERFUL, LOVING mother-in-law". What Norton in effect does,
is to just tick off both his wife AND his best friend.
6 posted on 12/30/2002 7:32:42 AM PST by C210N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
just another lie from the NYT to attempt to embarrass bush.
7 posted on 12/30/2002 7:55:19 AM PST by debg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: debg
I don't think the Saudis know exactly who's side they're on yet.
8 posted on 12/30/2002 8:09:09 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
i agree with ya there! but it is clear whose side the NYT's is on! i wish i had a list of how many times the NYT's made claims that have been called untrue this year.
9 posted on 12/30/2002 8:49:55 AM PST by debg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
I say F 'em and use their airspace anyway. If they decide to come down on the side of the Iraquis, all the better.

We can eliminate that festering rat hole as well.

10 posted on 12/30/2002 9:36:20 AM PST by Victor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson