My view is that any philosophy which is committed to "global democracy" and "global capitalism" is not that far removed from "global socialism".
By the way, I have noticed that your posts are not generally, excepting the issue of Israel, perhaps, of a neo-con bent. Why, then, do you defend the neo-cons, as you have done on several other threads?
My view is that any philosophy which is committed to "global democracy" and "global capitalism" is not that far removed from "global socialism".
Their universalist asparations are troubling. However, they support semi-limited government, private property, and less regultion. That isn't socialist.
By the way, I have noticed that your posts are not generally, excepting the issue of Israel, perhaps, of a neo-con bent.
I support Israel for a number of reasons. We are in a Clash of civilizations with the Mohammedins. Israel is an outpost. My solution in Israel is for a population transfer. It is one that would make neocons cringe.
You don't have to be a neocon to support Israel. I would argue that many paleos hate Israel only because most neocons love it.
Frankly, Israel can be used as a great tool to teach neocons and Chrsitian Zionists about the virtues of racialist realities.
Why, then, do you defend the neo-cons, as you have done on several other threads?
I hit both neocons and paleo-cons when I think they are wrong.
I am trying to get each side to see the others arguements.