Skip to comments.
Public transit becoming part of Vegas experience
The San Francisco Chronicle ^
| December 27, 2002
| Michael Cabanatuan
Posted on 12/28/2002 1:40:29 PM PST by Willie Green
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:41:35 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Las Vegas -- This glitzy desert oasis of gambling has always prided itself on breaking the rules. But now the city of neon, flash and fun is applying its rebellious spirit to the usually unglamorous world of public transportation.
While many gamblers, conventioneers and sightseers still cruise the Strip past behemoth hotels and casinos in rented convertibles or limousines, public transit has quietly become a big part of the Vegas experience. And it's about to get bigger -- and flashier.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; US: Nevada
KEYWORDS: masstransit; monorail; transportation
To: Willie Green
And when the Las Vegas Monorail
The major problem I have with the monorail that goes from the Grand down to Bally's is that you're waiting around forever for it. Plus its in the back of both casinos and it takes a long time to walk to get it to it. In fact I think it would be quicker to walk from the front of the Grand down to Bally's in the time it would typically take to ride the monorail.
What I think would be great is a traveling walkway, like in airports. You just step on and step off. Still get to see all the sites. No building of huge facilities to hold people. No expensive cars to make. Just a sidewises escalator.
2
posted on
12/28/2002 2:14:19 PM PST
by
lelio
To: lelio
What I think would be great is a traveling walkway, like in airports. You just step on and step off. Still get to see all the sites.Nah. The hookers would get all worn out, huffing and puffing just trying to keep up.
That's bad for business.
Ya gotta have stops where they can hang out without over-exerting themselves.
To: Willie Green
I have to wonder about any government service that is intentionally turning a profit.
To: sharktrager
Fine by me, as long as the tourists pay for it.
;^)
To: Willie Green
Well, one thing about this monorail, unlike, say, our light rail here in San Jose, California, the LV Monorail is privately funded. So, taxpayers (at least that is what they are saying about it) isn't paying the bill for it (that I'm aware of). If it turns a profit, at least it won't be subsidized by the taxpayers like our light rail and Bart system here in the Bay Area.
6
posted on
12/29/2002 4:23:55 AM PST
by
Simmy
To: Simmy
In most instances, local transit systems are subsidized because local merchants understand that such systems facilitate commerce.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson