Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TV's Law & Order Cracks Down on White Men
Toogood Reports ^ | 29 December 2002 | Nicholas Stix

Posted on 12/26/2002 12:23:10 PM PST by mrustow

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: mrustow
I watch L&O primarily for Jerry Orbach, who's one of my favorite actors. Most of the time I enjoy the show, but I have also noticed the PC nonsense that crops up when it comes to race. The examples cited in the article were bad, but I have one that's even worse. This episode was based on the real-life murder of a Chinese food deliveryman by a group of black teenagers. They got together in an abandoned building, used a cell phone to place an order even though they knew they had no money to pay for the food, then set upon the Chinese man when he made the delivery. They brutally beat him to death and robbed him. It really was a shocking case.

Well, Law & Order adapted this crime for an episode that aired a couple of seasons ago, and they were faithful to the details of the real crime except in one area: the murderous gang of teens ended up being white. And there was one more nasty little surprise in store -- the ringleader of the group was named Reagan! He ended up receiving the death sentence (none of the real-life perpetrators did, BTW). A PC victory all around.
41 posted on 12/26/2002 6:05:56 PM PST by Rainbow Rising
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jjm2111
Thanks for the pics, L.N. Tovah's in her fifties, but she's still a babe....and the product of lots and lots of elective surgery.

===========================

Plus careful lighting, top-grade hair and makeup artists, not to mention top-grade photographer(s) who took about 100+ fames to find this one.*

*In your average fashion photo shoot anywhere from 120-300 pictures are taken, of which maybe 3 are used (and often computer "enhanced")

42 posted on 12/26/2002 6:49:01 PM PST by yankeedame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gaspar
Have you ever seen a TV program with a courtroom scene where the judge wasn't an African-American?

==================

And/or a woman?

43 posted on 12/26/2002 6:50:06 PM PST by yankeedame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
I wasn't really watching it but "legally blond" was on the tube this A.M. I happened to glance at a courtroom scene and, you guessed it.

The judge was a Black female. I guess they figure they can kill two birds with one stone. Black and female.

My favorite show on tv is probably the Simpsons and it is probably better than most, but I just thought about it. The Judge and Doctor are Black.

44 posted on 12/26/2002 6:57:03 PM PST by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: mrustow
I thought all TV was "stupid white men"? Shows like Home Improvement have been in reruns for a while now. Heck I never saw the originals. Same goes for Friends, etc.

S.C.T.V. was a whole lot more entertaining than todays P.C.T.V.

No thanks, i'll stick with Discovery, TLC and a few others over that primetime garbage. And there's always FreeRepublic.

45 posted on 12/26/2002 7:03:55 PM PST by RckyRaCoCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Green Knight
That is all I ask ... if they would just keep their stupid opinions to themselves.

One can understand why they might be swept up in all that leftist bs, but please just shut up.

You would think they would realize that they are alienating a large portion of their audience but ....nooooo.
46 posted on 12/26/2002 7:46:38 PM PST by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: altura
Putting your name on a petition that over 100 other people signed is quite different from getting on national television and spouting your viewpoint. One is a personal expression of your own beliefs, and the other is trying to convert others to your beliefs through your own fame.

Don't get me wrong. I don't agree with it, and you can do whatever you want, but I'm still going to watch. I'm also not missing The Matrix 2 just because Morpheus signed it either. In my opinion that silly petition just doesn't rise to the level of Alec Baldwin type stupidity.

47 posted on 12/26/2002 7:57:24 PM PST by Hawkeye's Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Rainbow Rising
I watch L&O primarily for Jerry Orbach, who's one of my favorite actors. Most of the time I enjoy the show, but I have also noticed the PC nonsense that crops up when it comes to race. The examples cited in the article were bad, but I have one that's even worse. This episode was based on the real-life murder of a Chinese food deliveryman by a group of black teenagers. They got together in an abandoned building, used a cell phone to place an order even though they knew they had no money to pay for the food, then set upon the Chinese man when he made the delivery. They brutally beat him to death and robbed him. It really was a shocking case.

Well, Law & Order adapted this crime for an episode that aired a couple of seasons ago, and they were faithful to the details of the real crime except in one area: the murderous gang of teens ended up being white. And there was one more nasty little surprise in store -- the ringleader of the group was named Reagan! He ended up receiving the death sentence (none of the real-life perpetrators did, BTW). A PC victory all around.

I love Jerry Ohrbach, too. First saw him as incompetent mobster "Kid Sally Bananas" in The Gang That Couldn't Shoot Straight, and often heard his rendition on recordings from the original B'way Chicago of a song that's a variation on "Ya' Gotta Have a Gimmick." Years later, I saw him play the "criminal" brother of Martin Landau in Woody Allen's Crimes and Misdemeanors. Though it was before my time, the young Ohrbach's first big role was as the star of The Fantasticks. He's always good, and I've heard he's a real nice guy to his fellow thespians and crew members, unlike Sam Waterston, who's a notoriously unprofessional SOB.

Regarding the real case you mentioned, I believe the same writer dealt with L&O's misrepresentation of it a while back. I'll have to check on that.

48 posted on 12/26/2002 8:00:14 PM PST by mrustow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Sonny M
No, this outfit is in California, I think. They have nothing to do with that traitor. You're right about Duka being a con artist (in addition to a traitor who chums it up with Islamists).
49 posted on 12/26/2002 8:10:25 PM PST by Bogolyubski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Rainbow Rising
PC-TV Producers Invent Crimes to Score Real-World Debating Points

.... Not to be outdone, Law & Order's "heavy" could have been written by John Grisham. A high-end, Manhattan real estate agent, upon finding out that an interracial couple seeks buy a co-op in his building, sends a letter to the co-op board, objecting to the sale on explicitly racial grounds. Next, he gets the idea that a black colleague stole a client from him, and shows the colleague that he's got a gun stuck in his pants. That gets the racist fired; now he's even angrier. Soon thereafter, while hanging out with a friend during the evening, he hails a taxi, but a middle-aged black man beats him to the car. The white shouts racial epithets at the black rider, who refuses to give up the taxi. The white hails the next cab, whose driver he orders to follow the first cab. The racist ignores his friend's advice to drop the matter; the friend exits the cab. The racist follows the black rider to the latter's destination, and guns him down on the street.

Were a successful, young, white Manhattanite to write such a letter, it would have found its way to the front page of every newspaper in town, and the man would have been fired from his job, and prosecuted and sued for civil rights violations. But in Law & Order's parallel universe, there was no reaction to the letter.

The killer argues that minorities are "out to get whites." Producer Dick Wolf and his writers are thereby suggesting that any white with the same complaint, is also a savage monster. But one doesn't have to spend much time in New York, to know that minorities are out to get whites. It was January, 1991, when a white NYPD detective confirmed for me, that black-on-white racial attacks are an everyday event in New York. The detective added, that for "political reasons ... there are some things you're not allowed to say." And so, the rare white-on-black attack is treated as a "hate crime," but the constant black-on-white attacks almost never are, even when black attackers use racial epithets.

And make no mistake about it: Anti-white racial epithets are perfectly "normal" in New York. But in 16 years in this town, I have yet to hear a white call a black a racial epithet. Hell, in all those years, I've only heard whites say the "n" word three times in private.

And although black racist monsters are a dime a dozen in New York, no such white, racist monster has been recorded in at least fifty years. The Law & Order story was "ripped," alright. It was a rip-off of the ridiculous story line of last year's Shaft remake, in which a wealthy, white supremacist blithely murders a young black man in Midtown Manhattan.

Dick Wolf has been down this road before. He once presented prosecutor Kenneth Starr as a deranged Torquemada, who in the pursuit of power, peeps through people's bedroom key holes. And in another story, Wolf turned a band of young, black thrill murderers (in the real case that he "ripped from the headlines") into white killers.

Political types in Hollywood have long understood, that the easiest way to short- circuit political debate, is to present "realistic" dramas with cartoon-like images that support their prejudices. For Aaron Sorkin, Steven Bochco, and Dick Wolf, I have two words: You're busted!

50 posted on 12/26/2002 8:12:38 PM PST by mrustow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: mrustow
In the L & O version, the black suspects who were slated to be up for the death penalty for the killings, turned out to be innocent. The killer was white.

This guy needs to get his facts straight. I SAW this episode. The real killer was ALSO black, he was collared at the very end of the episode, he was a huge black man on a sofa when the cops busted in.

What a crock. L&O may have some liberal bias, but then what Hollywood show doesn't. It's one of the best shows out there, in terms of quality. And this specific complaint is total BS. The writer should learn how to do a basic cite-check before spouting off about it.

VR

51 posted on 12/26/2002 8:27:43 PM PST by VetsRule
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #52 Removed by Moderator

To: VetsRule
IIRC, you are mistaken.
53 posted on 12/26/2002 8:51:29 PM PST by mrustow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: lavocat
This article is a load of BS bordering bigotry. Shameful.

So, the Carnegie Deli killers were white? And Joyce Gilchrist was white? Oh, but you didn't see the shows, didn't hit the links, and probably didn't even bother reading the article!

So, how's life at DU, disrupter?

54 posted on 12/26/2002 8:54:11 PM PST by mrustow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

Comment #55 Removed by Moderator

To: mrustow
I'm 99% positive I'm not mistaken.

Remember, Southerlyn's moralizing gave McCoy pause, and he checked the cell phone records. They found another suspect and confirmed another piece of data (I think they figured out that he'd been busted before using the same type of gun). The police were sent in, the huge black guy was on the sofa when they arrested him, and then (IIRC) they found the gun whose ballistics matched, which was the end of the episode.

Surely we must have some other members who saw this episode?

VR
56 posted on 12/26/2002 8:54:51 PM PST by VetsRule
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

Comment #57 Removed by Moderator

To: lavocat
Saying an article "reeks bigotry" [sic] is on a par with calling it "racially insensitive." It's purely a rhetorical strategem that says nothing about the article, and merely tells the reader that you are politically opposed to the writer, and want him silenced.
58 posted on 12/26/2002 9:04:07 PM PST by mrustow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

Comment #59 Removed by Moderator

To: mrustow
bumpmarker
60 posted on 12/26/2002 9:10:45 PM PST by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson