Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TopQuark
OK, so if this academic discussion on economics holds water, why do professors need tenure?

Isn't this just a form of anti-capitalism job protectionism?
126 posted on 12/27/2002 4:16:47 PM PST by optimistically_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]


To: optimistically_conservative
Isn't this just a form of anti-capitalism job protectionism?

Tenure is given to faculty for the same reason as legal protection is given to whistleblowers. You can think of it as a witness-protection program of sorts.

The essential part of the job of an academic is pursuit of truth and teaching and assisting the students in these endeavors. New truth usually comes to the mind of one person before it is generally accepted. Between these to points in time --- the discovery and acceptance --- the discovery and its inventor are often unpopular. More often then not, the holders of previous views are entrenched and powerful. You probably are well aware of how long it took for the Church to accept that the Earth was round, while it burned at the stake quite a few people for that heresy: in one of the more famous cases, Giordano Bruno was burned at the stake in 1600, it took the Church almost 300 years to admit that it was a mistake.

In order to encourage the search for truth and protect the discoverer of the unpopular facts, faculty members are given tenure. This protects the faculty member from the administration --- the deans, provosts, presidents --- and allows the instructor to speak his or her mind in class.

From economic standpoint, it is a form of insurance without which the inherently risky endeavors will not be undertaken.

127 posted on 12/27/2002 4:31:50 PM PST by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson