Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: optimistically_conservative
Now, where is the specific pocket filled by H1-Bs that is not available in the American marketplace?

Exactly. Scratch an economist, or economist-wannabe, and find underneath an apologist multinational shill. As with statistics, in economics one can pretty much prove anything one wants-- just divide the pie in a different arbitrary manner and presto.

At the reality level, this merits a chuckle or two. I would challenge anyone who writes favorably about H1B policy to put themselves in the trenches for a time and experience the effects of the policy firsthand-- something I somehow doubt any H1B advocates ever bother to do.

The damage is not necessarily confined to economics. We are importing thousands of workers from overseas who have, in essence, a fundamentally different idea of what government is and should do in relation to the individual. These folks have little affinity for such cherished notions as the Constitution and Bill of Rights (you will hear from them phrases such as "why do you need that? in my country... [insert third-world socialist policy here]"). Please forgive some of us if we start to roll our eyeballs on hearing this.

And then the imported workers bring their relatives with the same [third-world socialistic, but then socialistic is generally good for multinational business] views.

But, hey, narrow your perspective enough, and align your frame of reference with the current multinational policy being hawked in the bowels of Congress, and any sow's ear becomes a purse. (Now to publish... :-)

You can say that the rewards are worth the pain all you want. But it is all about incrementalism. So go ahead and publish. If we all wake up someday and find a homegrown Bhopal in our own backyards, at least we'll know exactly who deserves the credit.

118 posted on 12/27/2002 10:53:03 AM PST by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: SteveH
Well said!

I am finding more (peer reviewed) papers now coming out of the economics and business administration study areas taking a hard look at CEO compensation and actual performance of the organization. This has been long overdue and finally reversing a trend from the counter-culture revolution and worsened during the "me-first" generation.

We lost much of our compassion for our fellow man. Some call that compassion Marxism. Others call it Christian. Regardless, I was raised by my parents and grandparents to refuse an ostentatious lifestyle because it was bad for the soul, to work hard and never feel superior to someone else. What I've found is that is a great recipe for accumulating great wealth while avoiding the temptations and pitfalls that plague the "talented" business leaders today.

Instead of teaching much of the fundamentals of good business practices, our institutions of higher learning teach how to take advantage of the system and sheeple to their own benefit. So the days of a handshake are gone, and corruption and lawsuits determine the character of business today.

In the process of moral relativism and greed is good, we've not only become more Marxist, but more Stalinistic. And I do believe that the growing gap in income between our poorest and our richest poses not only a threat to our economic well being, but also our democracy. We import the bourgeois socialist while promoting the robber-baron.
120 posted on 12/27/2002 12:06:41 PM PST by optimistically_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson