You then protest and claim superiority for having published in economics.
I surrender no high ground to you sir, may your search for the "truth" be fruitful.
When I said that I had published, it was offered not as achievement but an objective proof that I do not take sides and "worship CEOs," as you stated. True, this is insulting to me, and I did not feel like continuing the discussion. But I replied to your insinuation with a refutation: the work would not pass a peer review if it contained "worship of CEOs."
I have not responded with an insult but merely withdrew wishing you a good night.
You started with maligning CEOs without foundation and ended with doing that to me. Once more, instead of morally neutral explanations you prefer those that put someone in the negative light. It looks like you have a chip on your shoulder that you are trying to offload onto someone else. It's only getting bigger.
I surrender no high ground to you sir, I did not think I participated in a battle: a discussion is not wrestling. Moreover, when I do wrestle, I do not do so with children.
may your search for the "truth" be fruitful. Many thanks, I am doing fine so far and keep learning something new every day. It's always slow and difficult, but that's the nature of the beast --- especially when truth one seeks is not in the quotation marks.
Regards, TQ.