[PatrickHenry]

New thread ping.

[This ping list for the evolution -- not creationism -- side of evolution threads, and sometimes for other science topics. To be included, or dropped, let me know via freepmail.]

[Gary Boldwater]

What's amusing is that ancient man/dinosaurs are assumed to be most abundant where fossils are most easily found today - in dry, arid climates. Suppose man really started in Greenland, how would anyone know without a fossil record (which would now be under miles of ice)? It's fun to theorize but remember the data set is highly skewed.

[f.Christian]

More evo tripe...

Creation/God...REFORMATION(Judeo-Christianity)---secular-govt.-humanism/SCIENCE---CIVILIZATION!

Originally the word liberal meant social conservatives(no govt religion--none) who advocated growth and progress---mostly technological(knowledge being absolute/unchanging)based on law--reality... UNDER GOD---the nature of GOD/man/govt. does not change. These were the Classical liberals...founding fathers-PRINCIPLES---stable/SANE scientific reality/society---industrial progress...moral/social character-values(private/personal) GROWTH(limited NON-intrusive PC Govt/religion---schools)!

Evolution...Atheism-dehumanism---TYRANNY(pc/liberal/govt-religion/rhetoric)...

Then came the SPLIT SCHIZOPHRENIA/ZOMBIE/BRAVE-NWO1984 LIBERAL NEO-Soviet Darwin/ACLU America---the post-modern age of liberal tripe...

[aristeides]

Isn't the multiregional theory essentially Carleton Coon's old theory? Wasn't it discredited essentially for political reasons (an early example of PC) rather than scientific ones?

[JimVT]

Most scientists agree with the idea that our ancestors first spread out of Africa about 1.8 million years ago, conquering other lands.

My only concern in this whole debate is:

Am I entitled to reparations from somebody?

[gore3000]

They think some of these ancient people interbred with African hominids, contributing to the gene pool of modern humans.

The evidence denies the above. Both archaeological and DNA evidence - from actual DNA found in three separate locations - shows that our closest possible ancestors - the Neanderthals - could in no way have intermixed with Homo Sapiens and produced viable offspring. What we have here is much nonsense from the evolutionists trying to talk away the facts.

The new evidence, published online in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, is based on an analysis of data from the human genome project - the effort to map the entire human genetic blueprint.

The above shows it to be total nonsense. There is no reference point. The only non Homo-Sapiens DNA that has been found is from Neanderthals and that one has been shown to be too far from ours for any intermixing or any ancestor/descendant relationship to have been possible. This is junk science - just like most of the garbage written by evolutionists.

[mdmathis6]

Yep...those dang gumm Mexicans kept comin' over the border of Afreeker annd over runnin' all those nice neanderthal types....it created the whiaaate race and things bin downhill ever since....

[slimer]

Well, I hate to burst the bubble but ...This is How it All Began

[SunkenCiv]

Not a ping, just a GGG update.

Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on, off, or alter the "Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list --
Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
The GGG Digest -- Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)

[SunkenCiv]

Just updating the GGG information, not sending a general distribution.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list. Thanks.

Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)