Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arutz-7 Ship Raided, Warned Not To Broadcast
Arutz 7 ^ | Dec. 24, 2002 | staf

Posted on 12/24/2002 9:46:54 AM PST by Nachum

Israel Police and Communications Ministry personnel raided the Eretz HaTzvi broadcasting ship of Arutz-7 Israel National Radio this afternoon, halting the station's signal for over an hour. The ship's captain was warned not to resume transmission of the broadcasts.

The raid began at 1 PM, just as the news magazine hour was about to begin, and ended approximately 2:15. The police photographed equipment and workers, but confiscated nothing. Reports on Israel Radio that the police found only one person on board - the captain - are groundless, and in fact there were close to ten crewmembers on board at the time.

Arutz-7 broadcasts from outside of Israel's territorial waters in order to circumvent legislation that prohibits privately-owned radio stations from airing nationwide. A law duly passed by the Knesset granted Arutz-7 a broadcasting license was recently nullified by the Supreme Court.

Arutz-7 management noted that this was the first time in the history of Israeli off-shore broadcasting - including 22 years of Abie Natan's Voice of Peace ship, and 15 years for Arutz-7 - that police had ever made such a raid. "Not under the governments of Yitzchak Rabin, Shimon Peres, or Ehud Barak were police ever sent to raid a ship broadcasting from sea," the station said. "Only under Ariel Sharon did this happen. Could it have something to do with our opposition to a Palestinian state?"

Condemnations of the apparent blow against freedom of speech came only from the right-wing. Communications Minister Ruby Rivlin of the Likud said today that he was "furious" at the raid, citing in particular its timing during an election campaign. While the raid was underway, the Council of Jewish Communities in Yesha called upon Public Security Minister Uzi Landau - ministerial supervisor of Israel Police - to renew at once the broadcasts on Arutz-7, "which, especially during this period, is a national and patriotic mouthpiece for the struggle on behalf of the Land of Israel."

A spokesman for Minister Landau told Arutz-7 that he did not know of the raid in advance, and that it was initiated by the Communications Ministry a while ago. He preferred not to comment on the political aspects of the raid.

National Union party leader MK Avigdor Lieberman said that the raid is "nothing more than political scheming, based on election-campaign considerations and as revenge for Arutz-7's clear policy against a Palestinian state." His party colleagues also commented: MK Tzvi Hendel said that this is a case of "political persecution on the eve of elections," and demanded that Communications Minister Rivlin open an immediate investigation into how this occurred. MK Uri Ariel said that the raid is an attempt to "shut mouths." MK Benny Elon said that the authorities of the Supreme Court - which put a freeze on a duly-passed Knesset law legalizing Arutz-7 - must be curtailed "in order to prevent it from making a mockery of Israel's democracy."

Blame for the raid is already being freely apportioned. The police say that the Communications Ministry ordered the raid as part of its efforts against unlicensed stations. The Communications Ministry, however, says that the raid came in response to Elections Committee head Hon. Michael Cheshin's call to ensure that unlicensed stations do not broadcast election propaganda. Arutz-7 announced in response that it is more careful not to allow its interviewers and interviewees to speak on behalf of specific parties than are Israel's public stations.

Arutz-7's management released the following statement:

Announcement By Arutz-7 Management
"For 15 years, the State Prosecution and the police have waged a campaign to harm Arutz-7 by "hitting us in our pockets." On two previous occasions, police have smashed and confiscated our state-of-the-art broadcasting equipment, under the pretext that the station’s broadcasts are against Israeli law. No court has ever ruled that this is the case, but Arutz-7 has had to pay top lawyers' fees in order to defend itself against these allegations. Police raids like the one today are aimed solely at portraying the station as illegal, thus bringing about an immediate decrease in advertising income.

"The Prime Minister, Communications Minister, and Public Security (Police) Minister all denied prior knowledge of and involvement in today’s attempt to silence Israel’s only radio *voice opposing the establishment of Palestinian state. How, then, did it happen? Raids of this sort happen under right-wing governments because extremist left elements control key government institutions, including the police, the State Prosecution, the courts, and the Israel Broadcasting Authority. They are largely behind the systematic attempts to financially cripple and harm the lone nationalist voice on Israel’s airwaves. We turn to our listeners and internet readers to fight this trend in whatever legitimate manner is available. Please speak out, write letters and faxes, and support the station in its continual struggle to survive these blows against our right to champion the Jewish Nation's right to in the Land of Israel."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: arutz7; shipraided; warned
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
Kind of a "who done it". Was it the right? The left? The left under the right?
1 posted on 12/24/2002 9:46:54 AM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum
prohibits privately-owned radio stations from airing nationwide.

Kinda like being ruled by NPR.

2 posted on 12/24/2002 9:56:39 AM PST by per loin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Sometimes the tanks win in the end
3 posted on 12/24/2002 10:20:34 AM PST by arielb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: per loin
Time for Radio Free Israel, broadcast from a solar-powered unmanned airplaine circling the Med in international waters.
4 posted on 12/24/2002 10:25:57 AM PST by Tax Government
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tax Government
Direct satellite. Radio Free Israel from geosynch orbit.
5 posted on 12/24/2002 10:28:24 AM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
I don't care what they are broadcasting.. I don't care if they are railing against a Palestinian state or praising Osama bin Laden as the messiah.

If they aren't in Israel's waters then they should leave them alone, imho..

6 posted on 12/24/2002 10:33:47 AM PST by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
"If they aren't in Israel's waters then they should leave them alone, imho"

That kind thought did not save our sailors on the Liberty.
7 posted on 12/24/2002 11:26:46 AM PST by APBaer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: APBaer
It didn't save our soldiers on the Mayaguez either.
8 posted on 12/24/2002 11:31:30 AM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: APBaer
You puke.
9 posted on 12/24/2002 11:33:50 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: APBaer
Here's a tasty morsel for the rabid dog in you.
June 4 1939: In what came to be known as the "Voyage of the Damned" the SS St. Louis was turned away from the Florida coast and forced back to Europe with over 930 Jewish refugees fleeing Nazi rule. Most of these refugees later died in Nazi concentration camps.

June 8 1967: During the Six Day War, Israeli forces attacked the USS Liberty, a U.S. Navy intelligence-gathering ship off the coast of Gaza, killing 35 men and wounding 171.


10 posted on 12/24/2002 11:39:46 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
Why does the U.S. permit Al-Jazeera to continue to exist?
11 posted on 12/24/2002 11:50:09 AM PST by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
If they aren't in Israel's waters then they should leave them alone, imho..

Yep, keep on throwing the baby with the bathwater. Your friend Hitler was well versed in that purity of respect too.

12 posted on 12/24/2002 12:33:02 PM PST by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bvw
"June 8 1967: During the Six Day War, Israeli forces attacked the USS Liberty, a U.S. Navy intelligence-gathering ship off the coast of Gaza, killing 35 men and wounding 171."

Thank you for letting me know how lucky our sailors were at the hands of our "allies".
13 posted on 12/24/2002 1:14:08 PM PST by APBaer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bvw
Gee... I think I recognize you.
Didn't you used to work for Hillary Clinton?
14 posted on 12/24/2002 1:15:14 PM PST by APBaer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Seems a bit heavy handed. I guess Sharon doesn't expect the "far right" to vote for him anyway.
15 posted on 12/24/2002 1:57:48 PM PST by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: APBaer
Israel and the US were not allies in 1967.
I don't understand why the US refused to send Israel a Naval Attache and lied about keeping our ship out of the area.

It seems to me that either we were spying on Israel.
Furthermore, there were Russian and Egyptian intelligence ships transmitting information to Egypt. Israel attacked these along with the Liberty.
Mistakes happen in war, even among allies sharing information. Most recently, the US killed some Canadians in Afghanistan.

16 posted on 12/24/2002 2:22:41 PM PST by rmlew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: APBaer
Any tears on your part for those souls we turned away on the St. Louis?
17 posted on 12/24/2002 2:26:06 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise

Do you realize just how moronic this statement is yet?

Your knee jerk politics, guilt by association and smarm say allot more about you than you might think.

18 posted on 12/24/2002 2:56:50 PM PST by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: boris

My best guess: Targeting them would do more harm than good?

I object to global thought police actions. I believe it's counter productive and simply validates the message.

In this case, I agree to a large extent with the broadcasters message about a Palestinian state to a very large degree. But if I didn't, I don't see the advantage of trying to scare them into silence.

19 posted on 12/24/2002 3:04:12 PM PST by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise
I agree with the assertion that if they were out of Israel's territorial waters, then they had no business boarding that vessel

On another subject, the ability to disseminate and frankly discuss various viewpoints are part of the foundation of a republic. The suppression of "unacceptable" viewpoints undermines the legitimacy of such a government.

20 posted on 12/24/2002 3:51:10 PM PST by SauronOfMordor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson