[paulklenk]

Actually, dougie-poo, I did read your other two posts, and they were equally lame, but for other reasons. The whole "Jew bastard" story, even if true, is lame for two reasons: first, so what if she said that -- no one with a brain gives a crap anymore [even if every American hears of this incident it's not going to make a difference]; and two, a lie detector test proves nothing. Lie detector tests are not reliable. If Hillary took a lie detector test and passed, you would probably find a reason to discount it. And if The American Spectator is the primary source for the hospital story, it's not much of a source [too partisan]. Even if the story is true, the hospital is as much or more to blame for the incident; plus, it's something any politician, regardless of party, would do. Politicians and celebreties pull stunts like this all the time. Most of us adults figured that out a long time ago.

If we want to stop Hillary, we have to cut out this juvenile, ineffective FR-style of Hillary bashing and thwart her with something more substantial [like -- gee -- how about on policy?]. Or, if she really is a criminal [and I wouldn't put that past her], then put her the hell in jail, and don't ask some Larry Klayman type loser to prosecute her. Put up or shut up on the criminal thing.

But Hillary's negatives are too strong for her to win the presidency, so why are we worrying?

[doug from upland]

Thanks for the input. I'll give your comments the consideration they deserve.

[JZoback]

If we want to stop Hillary, we have to cut out this juvenile, ineffective FR-style of Hillary bashing and thwart her with something more substantial [like -- gee -- how about on policy?]

You actually believe the majority of the voting public decide who they are going to vote for because of one's policy???

Most people vote based on who has the biggest negatives. They vote for the one the dislike the least

This story if given proper air time would mean way more than what policy Hillary stands on.

[KeyBored]

"But Hillary's negatives are too strong for her to win the presidency, so why are we worrying?"

Here in NY a couple years back, we said the same thing regarding her negatives. We woke up the day after the election to SENATOR Hilliary!.

[desertcry]

Paul, what you said are well and good, but what are you doing about it?

[alrea]

But Hillary's negatives are too strong for her to win the presidency, so why are we worrying?

She might have a shot if the economy gets worse or if a big terrorist hit happens. Unfortunately that's significant incentive for terrorsocialists everywhere.