Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Torie
The chart suggest a flat tax applied on every tax, state, local and federal, would be a move towards progressivity, if only we could find a way to levy a sales tax on the amount that is saved rather than spent.

Progressive is regressive in that it punishes performance and rewards mediocrity and laziness. There is no reason for a progressive tax. It is theft.

52 posted on 12/22/2002 1:42:43 PM PST by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: meyer
Progressive is regressive in that it punishes performance and rewards mediocrity and laziness. There is no reason for a progressive tax. It is theft.

I get so annoyed over the way that term "progressive" is misused by leftist demagogues. It refers, of course, to rates that become progressively higher at higher income levels. It is not meant to imply that those that favor such rates are forward thinking, unlike the Neanderthals who favor a regressive rate structure. I know you know this but I had to rant. :)

It seems to me that a "flat tax" would be every man paying the same amount. Everyone pays $3,000. per year, for example. A flat tax rate, on the other hand, seems seems quite effective at soaking the rich, if that is one's goal. At 10%, the man making $10,000 pays $1,000, and the man making $10,000,000 pays $1,000,000, a thousand time more! Where is it written in stone that fairness demands progressive rates?

80 posted on 12/22/2002 2:46:49 PM PST by SupplySider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson