Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RANGERAIRBORNE
I think the problem is probably related to the short barrels on those M4 rifles. I don't really know anything about them but they look to be about 16". If so that is 4" shorter than a regular M16.

You are probably losing around 200 fps which doesn't sound like all that much but since energy is affected very much by changes in velocity it might just be enough to make the .223 rounds ineffective or at least less effective.

22 posted on 12/20/2002 3:53:37 PM PST by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: yarddog
I don't really know anything about them but they look to be about 16". If so that is 4" shorter than a regular M16.

I think you are right about the barrel length being the problem.
I'm pretty sure the M4 barrel is 14.5 " w/ a flash eliminator that takes it to approx 16".

From what I've read, the SS109 is effective, breaks into 3 pieces, at around 3000 fps and above. The 20" barrel develops enough velocity to give an effective range of 150+ yds. but the 14.5" barrel cuts that range down to 50 - 75 yds .
As velocity drops much below 3000 fps the SS109 just drills a 1/4" hole

55 posted on 12/20/2002 8:19:52 PM PST by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson