According to Rush Limbaugh and George W. Bush, the economy has everything to do with who is in the White House.
Your post effectively calls both of those Repukie Bozos "hypocrites and liars". At least we agree on something!
Not at all! Rushbo and W have just neglected the time lag associated with who is in the Whitehouse. Economic cycles are initiated years in advance of who is in the Whitehouse when the boom actually occurs. Clinton enjoyed the fruits of Reagan's Cold War victory. My statement merely indicates that that Clinton had nothing to do with the economic boom in the 90's and now Bush is reaping the drought created during the Clinton years. Instead of billions of dollars being spent in the military-industrial complex, real goods and services were produced during those Clinton years. Clinton did not foster economic development during his reign so we have the recession we now find ourselves in. This downturn is soley due to Clinton's lack of leadership and his poor ethics which bled over into corporate America.