Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy
In 1948, however, the issue was state-enforced segregation and denial of due process to blacks.

Once again, you ASSUME that is what he meant. In reality, you don't know but you are willing to give up the Senate over it.

78 posted on 12/18/2002 10:27:27 AM PST by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: AppyPappy
Once again, you ASSUME that is what he meant. In reality, you don't know but you are willing to give up the Senate over it.

Hank, YOU said there was nothing racial about the comments. You have REFUSED to say why. Taking away whatever Lott's motive may have been, there is a VERY clear connection between what Lott said and segregation, whether he meant it that way or not. Your decision as to Lott's motive is probably correct. But it doesn't change what Lott said, nor how it can clearly be interpreted.

95 posted on 12/18/2002 10:32:37 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson