Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lott complains about White House leaks in connection with controversy over racial remarks
Associated Press

Posted on 12/18/2002 9:58:16 AM PST by RCW2001

JESSE J. HOLLAND, Associated Press Writer
Wednesday, December 18, 2002
©2002 Associated Press

URL: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2002/12/18/national1216EST0589.DTL

(12-18) 09:35 PST WASHINGTON (AP) --

Senate Republican leader Trent Lott, fighting to surmount a furor over his racially insensitive remarks, complained Wednesday about anonymous White House leaks calling for his demise.

"There seems to be some things that are seeping out that have not been helpful," Lott said after a speech to the Chamber of Commerce in Biloxi, Miss.

"I understand how that happens because you've got a lot of people who work there that have different points of view," he told reporters. "But I believe they do support what I am trying to do here and the president will continue to do so."

For his part, though, President Bush declined again Wednesday to address the controversy when asked why his spokesman has repeatedly said that Lott should keep his job. Trying to distance himself from the racially charged issue, Bush has dodged questions about Lott since he condemned the Mississippi senator last Thursday.

But his brother, Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, said Lott's since recanted endorsement of South Carolina Sen. Strom Thurmond's 1948 segregationist presidential campaign was "damaging" Republicans.

"It doesn't help to have this swirling controversy that Sen. Lott, in spite of his enormous political skills, doesn't seem to be able to handle well," Gov. Bush told The Miami Herald. "Something's going to have to change. This can't be the topic of conversation over the next week."

Officials close to the White House are suggesting that Lott step down, and Senate Republicans indicated they need to resolve the situation before the beginning of next year's Congress.

But Lott thinks he will survive. "I'm telling you here this morning, I'm hanging in there," Lott told the Biloxi Chamber of Commerce. "I'm going to find a way for myself, my family, my friends, you the people of Mississippi and America to benefit from this experience."

Lott, who told ABC News he has talked to almost all of the Senate GOP caucus, said he believed a "majority" of Republicans in the Senate support him. He said he would continue working to keep his job in the days leading up to a Jan. 6 meeting where Republicans are to decide his future.

Meantime, the Virginia NAACP called on the state's U.S. senators to dump Lott as majority leader. "We demand that our senators vote against Trent Lott," said King Salim Khalfani, executive director of the chapter

GOP officials are concerned that removing Lott from his leadership position might prompt his resignation from the Senate, which would throw the Senate back into a 50-50 split if Mississippi's Democratic governor picks a member of his own party to serve on an interim basis.

But Lott insisted Wednesday that he would not give up his Senate seat. "I was elected by the people of Mississippi to a six-year term," he told reporters. "I've served two years of that contract. I have a contract and I'm going to fulfill it."

Yet, officials said there have been discussions among senators eager to have a successor to Lott emerge as the party's leader when the Senate convenes under Republican control next month.

"There is now a substantial question as to whether Senator Lott has the capacity to move" the GOP agenda in the new Congress, said Sen. Jim Talent, R-Mo., one of the new guard of Republicans whose election last month helped deliver a majority to the GOP.

There was a widespread consensus among the GOP operatives and strategists that Lott must go. The opinion was shared by senior White House aides, but officials there insisted that neither Bush, political guru Karl Rove or his deputies were even indirectly involved in a campaign against Lott.

Lott triggered the controversy Dec. 5 at a 100th birthday party for Thurmond. He said people in Mississippi were proud to have voted for Thurmond at the time, adding, "if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn't have had all these problems over all these years either."

He since has apologized repeatedly, including in a news conference at home in Mississippi where he asked for forgiveness and forbearance, and on Black Entertainment Television on Monday night where he announced his support for affirmative action despite having voted against such programs in the past.

Sen. Pat Roberts of Kansas, echoing many others, called for a final decision to be made before the new year. "This matter has gone beyond the statement of a single individual to one of national importance, and unfortunately divisiveness and turmoil. As such, this situation should be and very well may be resolved prior (to) Jan. 6," he said.

One lawmaker who has spoken with Lott in recent days said the Mississippian appears to have the support of most members of his leadership team and many senior members, some of whom are in line to become committee chairmen and may value maximum independence from the White House when it comes time to negotiate over legislation. "But he was also fully aware that this thing is very fluid and dynamic," said the lawmaker, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

There was no shortage of speculation about replacement candidates.

Talk centered on Sen. Don Nickles, R-Okla., the outgoing No. 2 Republican and a longtime Lott rival, along with Sens. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.; and Rich Santorum, R-Pa.

©2002 Associated Press  


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: stopthebleeding
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 381-389 next last
To: dirtboy
Lott didn't mention the Dixiecrats. He mentioned Thurmond. What was Thurmond's stance on defense?

I'm sorry, I missed your answer. Lott was speaking specifically about Thurmond, not the Dixiecrats. What was Thurmond's stance on defense?

141 posted on 12/18/2002 10:47:34 AM PST by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: F-117A
Acutally he was running on States Rights [one of which would have concerned segregation].

Bag it. We've shot down that claim so many times, it's automatic. The Dixiecrats walked out of the 1948 Dem Convention in protest of civil rights proposals in the Dem Platform, and started a segregationist party, wrapped in the cloak of states rights, to perpetuate Jim Crow in the South. END OF STORY. Quit trying to pretend otherwise, the facts simply do not bear you out.

142 posted on 12/18/2002 10:47:55 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Coop
That 1948 campaign also strongly supported equal powers to the three branches of government. But you only assume his comment had negative racial tones.

Oh, come on. It was states rights - strictly in the context of segregation. This is getting really, really lame.

143 posted on 12/18/2002 10:48:48 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
You'd be doing yourself (and me) a big favor if you'd learn to present a coherent argument with supporting facts.
144 posted on 12/18/2002 10:48:55 AM PST by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
I think Specter said Lott was being "lynched" while he was defending him on TV.
145 posted on 12/18/2002 10:49:24 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
So I don't think Lott was necessarily lying, just horribly misinformed.

Sorry, he had several days to figure out the Dixiecrat platform before he made that apology and claim, so that theory doesn't wash with me.

146 posted on 12/18/2002 10:50:13 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW

147 posted on 12/18/2002 10:52:02 AM PST by ewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: rintense
"But he HIMSELF did that when he came down hard on Lott last week, and then decided to back away. He could have said Lott was wrong in a much better way than he did and successfully not crossed that branch bridge."

Do you think that as the top Leader of the GOP that Bush had a place to condone the comments, at the very least, if he felt Lott had damaged the agenda and ability to communicate with all of America?

Don't forget, this blew up as Bush was preparing (to which he delivered his comments about Lott) address a very diverse Philadelphia audience on faith based initiatives.
148 posted on 12/18/2002 10:53:25 AM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Coop
Two words: Greg Ganske

LOL...a hearty amen to that!

149 posted on 12/18/2002 10:54:26 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
I'm sorry, I missed your answer. Lott was speaking specifically about Thurmond, not the Dixiecrats. What was Thurmond's stance on defense?

Hank, someone else has already clarified this for you, so I can only conclude that you are just in deliberate denial at this point. If you want to sit there like a petulant child and take your position all the way to Absurdistan, go right ahead, but I'm not gonna waste any more time with you.

150 posted on 12/18/2002 10:54:37 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Coop
what facts do you want pointed out? This is a hate crime against Lott by republican fools!
151 posted on 12/18/2002 10:54:37 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: rintense
Bush didn't say that Lott SHOULDN'T resign only that he doesn't NEED to. The WH wants this to leak. He wants Lott to get the message. Lott has a thick skull, though. Subtlety doesn't work with him.
152 posted on 12/18/2002 10:55:28 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ewing
is that a threat?
153 posted on 12/18/2002 10:55:47 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: JDGreen123
I agree with all of that and steadfastly maintain that Lott will remain in the Senate, but not in leadership.

"They know he is the best thing they have going. They will throw anything they want in front of him, label it "civil rights" related, and he will sign it."

This was my worst case scenario with any leadership at any time concerning the Vacant Lott. It's obviously been realized after the BET self-mutilation (and the rest he threw overboard) on Monday night.
154 posted on 12/18/2002 10:55:51 AM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Why is it getting lame? Because you're not convincing enough? You have apparently decided you know what Trent Lott meant. Good for you. I think that's kinda foolish. For him to be that racist, to call for a 1948 agenda to bring back segregation, there's no way he could have survived all these years in public service.
155 posted on 12/18/2002 10:57:14 AM PST by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
"NO WAY THE BIG FAT LADY HASN'T SUNG YET......"

If you'd quiet down for a moment, that noise you'd hear is her in her final warmups...
156 posted on 12/18/2002 10:57:17 AM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
If Bush wasn't such a gentleman, he probably could have Lott gone from the Senate by now as well.

Chaffee is the first of many to start the GOP call for Chester to leave..

The only way do deal with a traitor in the ranks is to fumigate his office!

157 posted on 12/18/2002 10:57:28 AM PST by ewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
I was referring to our esteemed Incoming Majority Leader Chester as the 'Dead Man Walking.'
158 posted on 12/18/2002 10:58:35 AM PST by ewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
what facts do you want pointed out? This is a hate crime against Lott by republican fools!

For starters, the names of these fools. The crime. And at least a basic connection between said names and said crime, to at least suggest a conspiracy.

159 posted on 12/18/2002 10:59:03 AM PST by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: ApesForEvolution
There you go. I won't miss Lott's "leadership."
160 posted on 12/18/2002 10:59:05 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 381-389 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson