Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Missing RIAA figures shoot down "piracy" canard
The Register ^ | 16/12/2002 | Andrew Orlowski

Posted on 12/17/2002 10:26:13 PM PST by prisoner6


Missing RIAA figures shoot down "piracy" canard

Posted: 16/12/2002 at 20:15 GMT

Research by George Zieman gives the true reason for falling CD sales: the major labels have slashed production by 25 per cent in the past two years, he argues.

After keeping the figure rather quiet for two years, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) says the industry released around 27,000 titles in 2001, down from a peak of 38,900 in 1999. Since year-on-year unit sales have dropped a mere 10.3 per cent, it's clear that demand has held up extremely well: despite higher prices, consumers retain the CD buying habit.

Increasingly hysterical comments from RIAA chairperson and chief random-number-generator Hilary Rosen suggest that many billions of potential sales have been lost.

In August analysts Forrester attributed the decline in sales to the economy, citing historical precedent, and argued that music downloads could revive the industry.

So why isn't the RIAA trumpeting this affirmation in music sales, and something of a renaissance in its business efficiency?

Perhaps because the RIAA's version of the truth doesn't fit with the facts. Zieman points out that only 3,000 sales of each of the missing 12,000 titles would have been enough to see overall growth continue to grow.

Heavens, you'd be forgiven for thinking the labels slashed investment with the intention of seeing overall demand decline. Perhaps there's a more benign explanation, however: A&R budgets are set well in advance, and with Napster causing a mighty panic amongst industry executives a couple years ago, they decided to cut the rosters, close their eyes and wait for a bomb that never went off. But far from being besieged by CD-burning vandals, the music industry is seeing astonishingly resilient demand.

For years the independent labels chaffed at the RIAA's sanctioned monopoly on representing recording artists, and dreamt that a mighty, populist wave of artists seeking more equitable treatment, and a public seeking more interesting music, would wash it away overnight.

That doesn't seem necessary. The RIAA appears to be imploding without any assistance at all, under the weight of its own logic. ®

Related Link
RIAA's Statistics Don't Add Up to Piracy - Ziemann [thanks to JP]


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cd; musicpiracy; recording; riaa
All what the article claims PLUS the fact that what the "music industry" is pushing can't measure up to what's available by independent musicians for free on the net.

It would be interesting, albeit impossible, to factor in a couple of other aspects as well. Attendeance or sales of concert tickets of RIAA musicians compared to indies. You would also have to toake into account the downturn in the economy and compare other businesses with music industry sales.

But basically I still think the reason MI sales are off is because what they are offering and the only thing they promote is garabge.

prisoner6

1 posted on 12/17/2002 10:26:14 PM PST by prisoner6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: prisoner6
After keeping the figure rather quiet for two years, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) says the industry released around 27,000 titles in 2001, down from a peak of 38,900 in 1999. Since year-on-year unit sales have dropped a mere 10.3 per cent, it's clear that demand has held up extremely well: despite higher prices, consumers retain the CD buying habit. Has this man ever graduated from high school?

If the demand is constant and production is lower than the demand, there is rationing, i.e., some of thost wishing to buy a CD cannot get it. Have you heard of many such cases? Probably not. In addition, you cannot deduce that number from the industry side and have to look at the size of shortages in the market.

2 posted on 12/17/2002 10:58:38 PM PST by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
If the demand is constant and production is lower than the demand, there is rationing, i.e., some of thost wishing to buy a CD cannot get it. Have you heard of many such cases? Probably not. In addition, you cannot deduce that number from the industry side and have to look at the size of shortages in the market.

True, but the number of CD's people buy will certainly be affected by the number of different titles tendered for sale. The 25% drop in the number of different titles probably wouldn't be expected to cause a 25% drop in sales, but it should be expected to cause at least some drop.

3 posted on 12/17/2002 11:28:19 PM PST by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
The reduction was in the number of titles not in the number of CDs pressed (or whatever you call it when you make a CD.)

That's not particularly clear from the article though. I very nearly wrote a similar response.
4 posted on 12/17/2002 11:29:09 PM PST by MattAMiller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MattAMiller; supercat
Thank you for your clarification. But "production" people usually mean volume, not the width of the product line. Thanks.
5 posted on 12/18/2002 5:38:22 AM PST by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson