This article reeks of a tone I've heard often from liberal friends: "if ain't perfect , better not do it". Heck, it's only nuking a major American city we're talking about, right? Better not do it, 0% chance is better than 62% right?
Now, when I point out the abysmal rate of sucess of liberal social programs -- welfare deepening not reducing poverty, needle-exchange increasing drug dependency, then , well, "we just need to keep working harder at it" .
Ignorant boobs.
While I support a missile defense, the real threat is a nuke trucked in from Mexico. That's probably 90% of the threat, and they only need it to work once to suceed..
I suppose after we lose 1, 2, 20 cities we'll close the borders and shoot down any incoming plane or boat without notice.