To: wardaddy
Rove and Frist have done a good job so far. Far better than Lott, IMO.
I want RESULTS. I will not tolerate idiots and fools in positions that serve as spokesmen for the party. Particularly when their idiocy hurts efforts by the party to broaden its base. Lott's stupidity did that, and I'm being pretty charitable to the man. Because the pattern's enough to tar him pretty bad, IMO.
224 posted on
12/17/2002 1:56:41 PM PST by
hchutch
To: hchutch
Lott's more of a palm greaser than a spokesman.
In any event....I'm not happy about any of it from Lott(never liked him) to his detractors....it's all FUBAR and has been mishandled by everyone who's touched it from the getgo.
Lott's sucking up makes me more inclined to see him step down....yes, even if it scores a victory for the PC mob but he should be paid off to keep his seat if need be. We don't need to let the baby get thrown out with the bath water.
Keeping the Senate is more important than any one person's ambitions. And don't bring up principles please. This is politics and drowning on principles while your enemies have none is Quioxtic.
Sancho!!....fetch my sword!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson