Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lott, Nickles Civil Rights Votes Similar (Says NAACP as they search their next target)
ap ^ | 12/16/2002 | JIM ABRAMS

Posted on 12/16/2002 3:00:07 PM PST by TLBSHOW

WASHINGTON - Sen. Don Nickles (news, bio, voting record), the first Senate Republican to suggest that Trent Lott should be replaced as their leader, has built a civil rights voting record that is nearly identical to that of the man he would depose.

The NAACP says that over the past decade, Nickles and Lott have voted the same on almost every issue deemed important by the civil rights community. And in almost every case, their votes were contrary to the wishes of that community.

On the other hand, both Nickles, of Oklahoma, and Lott, of Mississippi, win the highest ratings from conservative groups. In 2000, the American Conservative Union gave both 100 percent ratings on key votes.

Lott, Senate Republican leader since 1996, is to become Senate majority leader next month. But his position in the party is in jeopardy because of statements he made at Sen. Strom Thurmond (news, bio, voting record)'s 100th birthday party Dec. 5 indicating a nostalgia for the South's pro-segregation past.

Nickles, currently the second-ranked Senate Republican and a past rival for Lott's leadership position, on Sunday became the first GOP senator to call for new leadership elections.

"I am concerned that Trent has been weakened to the point that may jeopardize his ability to enact our agenda and speak to all Americans," Nickles said.

Since the controversy began, Lott's critics have tried to show that for the past two decades he has consistently voted against civil rights bills. His allies, in turn, have produced records showing that Nickles and Lott are ideological compatriots.

In 1983, for example, both Lott, then in the House, and Nickles opposed a new federal holiday commemorating the birthday of Martin Luther King, Jr. Lott said the holiday would cost the government too much money and that there were other Americans "more deserving." Nickles unsuccessfully pushed alternatives to a paid holiday, including observing the holiday on a Sunday.

That same year both Lott and Nickles backed a Jesse Helms amendment that would have preserved the tax-exempt status of private schools, such as Bob Jones University, which then banned interracial dating. The measure was defeated.

In 1990, the two senators both voted to uphold the first President Bush (news - web sites)'s veto of legislation to amend the 1964 Civil Rights Act to ban workplace discrimination. The president contended it would lead to racial quotas.

The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (news - web sites), in its scorecards of the past six Congresses, found Nickles and Lott voted identically in four Congresses on the votes it tracked, and differed by one or two votes in the other two Congresses.

In the 107th Congress that just ended, the NAACP gave Lott a 14 percent rating for voting with NAACP recommendations on five of 37 civil rights-related bills, while Nickles got a 19 percent rating with seven votes.

Among the issues where the senators differed with the NAACP were funding for Head Start and other education programs, the confirmation of John Ashcroft (news - web sites) as attorney general and global AIDS (news - web sites) funding.

Both got 13 percent ratings in the 1999-2000 Congress, and in 1997-1998, Lott and the NAACP agreed on two out of 10 votes, Nickles on only one out of 10.

"We are concerned that Nickles has voted just as poorly or even more poorly than Trent Lott," said Hilary Shelton, director of the NAACP's Washington office.

The two have differed on several major civil rights measures. In 1982, then-Rep. Lott voted against extending the Voting Rights Act, while Nickles, then a first-term senator, voted for it.

In 1991, Nickles voted with the majority to defeat a measure to abolish affirmative action in federal hiring. Lott backed the measure.

And last year, Lott was the only dissenting vote in a 93-1 vote to approve Roger Gregory as the first black judge on the U.S. Appeals Court for the 4th Circuit, which covers several southern states. Lott said he objected to then-President Clinton (news - web sites) making a temporary appointment of Gregory while Congress was in recess.

Among other votes:

_In 1991, both voted with a 93-5 majority to strengthen federal civil rights law and extend damages for intentional employment discrimination.

_In 1993, both voted to extend the Confederate flag design patent for the Daughters of the Confederacy. The measure was defeated 75-25

_In 1994, both sided with a Helms amendment to strip federal funding from the Martin Luther King Jr. Federal Holiday Commission. The amendment was defeated.

_In 1998, both voted to eliminate a disadvantaged business enterprise program established in the Reagan administration to ensure that a certain percentage of federal contracts went to businesses headed by minorities and women. The program was preserved on a 58-37 vote.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: lott; naacp; nickles
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last
To: TLBSHOW
By the standards this article uses they'd probably look at JC Watts' voting record and decide he's a racist.
41 posted on 12/16/2002 6:35:52 PM PST by Puddleglum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
"This is why it is bad if Lott steps down."

No, this is why it is bad when you have a Senate Majority Leader who can't be trusted to make a public statement without somehow embarrassing the party -- by his thoughtlessness, insensitivity and downright breathtaking stupidity.

This is not the first time Lott has done something like this, though it is certainly the most embarrassing. And, if he stays in his leadership post, it won't be the last.

As the senior Senator from Mississippi, he's less dangerous to conservatism. And an effective Majority Leader would be a pleasant change of pace.

42 posted on 12/16/2002 6:37:50 PM PST by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: okie01
By the way, the best proof of BuzzFlash's perspective is that most of the press stories included a sentence along the lines, "Despite a Democratic outcry for Lott's resignation as majority leader." Well, since the Democratic leadership wasn't calling for Lott's resignation, this appears to be a story line planted by Rove. In fact, more Republicans, particularly the right wing "amen chorus" of columnists, were the ones calling for Lott to step down in an apparent orchestrated, behind-the-scenes media strategy.

rat site
43 posted on 12/16/2002 6:39:28 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Some Republicans are uncomfortable as the majority party. As majority party, they would actually have to DELIVER things. They would actually have to MAKE THINGS HAPPEN, which would be UPSETTING to some people out there in media-land.

See, as long as they were minority party, they could enjoy their perks, and get along with the Democrats, and nobody would have to get upset...

44 posted on 12/16/2002 6:41:28 PM PST by SauronOfMordor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
Bush is so smart but so dumb, his whole party has crumbled
45 posted on 12/16/2002 6:55:47 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
BuzzFlash and the boys are certainly given to "evil Republican conspiracies", aren't they?

Somehow, I just can't see Karl Rove dictating to the editors of the NYTimes, WPost, Time, Newsweek, ABC/CBS/NBC/CNN, et al.

46 posted on 12/16/2002 6:56:41 PM PST by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: okie01
they aren't talking about NYTimes, WPost, Time, Newsweek, ABC/CBS/NBC/CNN, et al.

they are talking about this


Trent Lott: Worse than Satan (right-wing journalists and pundits acting like Girly-boys)
Cornell Review ^ | 12/12/2002 | Joseph J. Sabia





In response, the Family Research Council, National Review Online editor Jonah Goldberg, radio talk show host Laura Ingraham, columnist Andrew Sullivan and others have joined Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton in demanding Lott’s head on a platter.

Clearly, Lott was simply gushing over Thurmond’s impressive career when he made a little joke about how America would have been better if Mr. Dixiecrat had taken the White House in ‘48. Was it a politically incorrect joke? Definitely. Was it a stupid thing to say? Maybe. But I can’t help thinking that the joke ticked off exactly the right people—black liberals, hysterical Republican elites, and Mark Shields. The best part was that Lott did not even know what he was doing…his instinct just led him to say something that was horribly insensitive. Sometimes you just have to sit back and enjoy that sort of quality in a public figure.

So why are these “girly boys,” as Ann Coulter once called them, acting as if Trent Lott burned a cross on Colin Powell’s lawn? Most of them have ulterior motives.


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/805592/posts?page=78#78

47 posted on 12/16/2002 7:02:40 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
So Lott committed verbal thoughtcrime which is doubleplusungood.

Since 1948, and then LBJ and his so called "Great Society in 1964" our Country's morals have gone in the dumpster, we have millions of brothers and sisters sitting on the porch in government paid apartment rents up to $2000 a month plus other government paid benefits so they can vote rat.

Meanwhile, the rats and other leftists certainly needed a small shred to get their ratty teeth into anything at this point.

Lott needs to step down as majority leader, but stay on as a Senator, and let the voters of Missippi decide his ultimate fate.

48 posted on 12/16/2002 7:07:18 PM PST by oldtimer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #49 Removed by Moderator

To: CapHaddock
shhh don't tell em that they too stupid to know!
50 posted on 12/16/2002 7:19:38 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: CapHaddock
welcome to fr home of clueless ones
51 posted on 12/16/2002 7:23:58 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: oldtimer
Lott said he didn't think he should have to resign or be replaced, and denied that he is a racist. "To be a racist, you have to feel superior," Lott told interviewer Ed Gordon. "I don't feel superior to you at all."

Lott, sitting alone with Gordon in a Mobile, Ala. television studio, continued to insist that he didn't mean anything racial with his Thurmond comments.

"What did you mean when you say 'those problems'?" Gordon said.

"I was talking about the problems of defense, of communism, and budget, of a government that sometimes didn't do its job," Lott said. "But again I understand that was interpreted by people the way it was and I should have been sensitive to that. I obviously made a mistake and I'm doing everything I can to admit that and deal with it and correct it. And I'm hope that people will give me a chance to do so."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A63937-2002Dec16.html
52 posted on 12/16/2002 7:29:19 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Now the libs have him groveling - he needs to just be Senator IMO.

We had new carpeting installed in our offices over the weekend - Hispanics, and they worked hard - very hard.

Affirmative action is an abomination.

53 posted on 12/16/2002 8:00:07 PM PST by oldtimer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
btt
54 posted on 12/17/2002 5:31:06 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: oldtimer
Now the libs have him groveling - he needs to just be Senator IMO.

If he resigns, he will be labled a racists for life and every time he votes on a racial issue, every Republican who votes with Lott will be labled a racist, or even worse if Lott supports something, they will say even the racist Lott supports this. We need to stand up for Lott in this political witch hunt, otherwise we will empower the race-baiting tactics of the left. Nothing short of Lott resigning and helping the Dems take back the Senate will shut them up (and even that won't really shut them up). This is the Dems attempt to steal the Senate, like they did with Jeffords and like they did in NJ and like they tried to steal the Presidency in Florida. We must stand against it.

55 posted on 12/17/2002 7:10:35 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: All
BUMP TILL YOU GET IT
56 posted on 12/17/2002 7:13:19 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: All
REMEMBER IF WE DON'T STAND TOGETHER THEY WILL COME FOR EVERYONE

don't ever apologize again,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
57 posted on 12/17/2002 11:19:17 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
I am telling you freepers, Lott isn't the problem but racist rats are and the liberal press. Lott is this weeks dinner and next week its who ever we would favor always has been and always will be. Either we stand with Lott as a force or each one of us and who we would choose is the target, its the nature of the beast! Liberal commie democrats beast that is.

Well Said, TLBSHOW.

58 posted on 12/17/2002 11:54:31 AM PST by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Good point. Hang in there Trent. Of course, the Sharpton's and Waters, et pukes, of this world along with the leftists will label him a racist which is the worst form of thoughtcrime.
59 posted on 12/17/2002 3:47:38 PM PST by oldtimer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: oldtimer
Yeah, hang in there, Trent. We really need you to ensure that the DemocRAT agenda gets carried out as the price of peace on the Hill.
60 posted on 12/17/2002 3:49:51 PM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson