Does al-Qaida have20 suitcase nukes?

World Net Daily ^ | 10-2-02 | World Net Staff

[Rudder]

Breaking on Drudge today: 12-15-02--Is it true?

[cardinal4]

Bin Ladin would have used one by now.

[PRND21]

Bin Ladin would have used one by now.

Bin Laden is alive?!

[sonofatpatcher2]

Doubtful, but possible.

[Travis McGee]

It is NOT true.

Al Queda has 17 suitcase nukes and 4 steamer trunk nukes.

Osama Bin Ladin told me yesterday when I asked him.

Glad to clear this up for you.

[Tijeras_Slim]

All 20 were lost by the automated baggage handling machinery at Denver Airport.

[backhoe]

FYI. member Dan Day supplied this:

And how much damage (radius in miles) could a suitcase nuke deliver?

Max yield of a "suitcase nuke" is about 1 kiloton That's 1/15th the yield of the (relatively small) a-bomb we dropped on Hiroshima.

The smallest US nukes ever made had yields on the order of 0.02 kilotons:

That's about 5 times the power of the OKC bomb, so you could pretty much wipe out any single building or close-spaced cluster of buildings, but you couldn't wipe out all of DC with it. Total damage wouldn't be any greater than that already achieved in lower Manhattan right now.

[Paulus Invictus]

If this is true, hello world choas! The rag heads would be irradiated toast everywhere if one or more of our cities were eliminated. Armageddon would also occur if Israel got one of the suitcases exploded anywhere near them.

[Excuse_My_Bellicosity]

The suitcase nuke is the biggest scam perpetrated on the American public since global warming and One-Hour Martenizing.

[Centurion2000]

Nope ... at least one would have been used by now.

[struwwelpeter]

"Da, we sell nuclear devoise, but he promise to be careful wit it."

[theyreallthesame]

"Total damage wouldn't be any greater than that already achieved in lower Manhattan right now."

I thought we were talking about Nukes...Not HILLARY.

[muleskinner]

Is the guy in the middle the Eagles coach?

[Yasotay]

It is very clear that Saddam has nukes. It is also very clear that the US Government believes that there is a VERY good chance that the terrorists have nukes. The real question is do they have a "working nuke"? Otherwise why did the President go to the Nuclear Command bunker on 11 September .... Why was the mall in DC evacuated? Why was the national leadership sent to "secure" locations? Why is the VP kept away from the President? The normal defense against Chemical weapons is filters and over pressure. Bio defense is drugs.

[Quix]

I doubt that seriously.

I believe he'd wait until

(A) ordered to do so by puppet masters behind the scenes.

OR

(B) using them stood a much greater chance of

(1) either finishing the USA off essentially

OR

(2) causing WWIII in which Russia, China, North Korea, Lybia, Cuba and Mexico would help finish the USA off . . . some sources insist with a European country joining in on the side of our enemies.

He has a lot more reasons to keep his nuclear powder dry until the MOST OPPORTUNE moment(s).

I'm confident he or his successors are waiting. . . how long or for what is another matter.

One can fantasize that the above evidence is not true. It's far more logical to be true. There are toooooo many factors indicating it OUGHT to be true REGARDLESS of the well sourced evidence above.

Just logically it seems to me to be exceedingly likely to be true. I mean--if YOU were Bin Laden with HIS resources, wouldn't YOU have done so--assuming you'd had his values, of course. Similarly, wouldn't you be waiting until the MOST OPPORTUNE, MOST DESTRUCTIVE MOMENT to use them on the 'great satan?'

[Timm]

The uranium or plutonium in these bombs has to be replenished after several years. The bombs do not have an indefinite shelf life. They would be much less useful to Bin Laden now than when he bought them, and less so over time. Why would he buy them and not use them for ten years? Has there been no "opportune" moment before now? No time at which it would make sense, for him, to nuke New York, though there has been what he saw as an opportune moment to kill tens of thousands of people with hijacked aircraft?

When Afghanistan was being overrun by agents of the great satan, why wouldn't Bin Laden use a bomb then? What would he be waiting for?

The Soviets didn't have enormously good record keeping, but it's unlikely any of their nukes, much less 20, or 100, or whatever we were told, fell out of their control. If they did, we ought to have better evidence of it now than second and third-hand stories that are ten years old.

[The Real Deal]

I think that it is highly unlikely! We would have seen a mushroom cloud by now!

[jlogajan]

The suitcase nuke is the biggest scam perpetrated on the American public ... One-Hour Martenizing.

Looks like they caught ol' Gil in another scam

[templar]

Total damage wouldn't be any greater than that already achieved in lower Manhattan right now.

But, it could be the location of the damage, not the size of the damage, that would count. Congress, Whitehouse, Hoover Dam, etc. Nukes, even very small ones, could make some targets that would seem impervious to attack quite vulnerable.