Can't say as I disagree.
Posted on 12/14/2002 10:37:31 PM PST by ex-Texan
Lott Should Go
A bad Majority Leader gets worse
By NR Editors
Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott "has proven himself better suited to the back bench, where he is at least a generally reliable conservative vote. And there is an alternative in Oklahoma Sen. Don Nickles . . . Conservatives should encourage Nickles to make the — admittedly risky — challenge against Lott."
Thus wrote National Review in November 1998 after the GOP midterm disaster that year. We have long considered Lott a clumsy and ineffective Republican leader, and his controversial Strom Thurmond birthday remarks are a spectacular confirmation of that judgment. Is Lott a racist? We don't think so. Are many of the attacks on him dishonest and opportunistic? Yes. But he has been a poor leader of Senate Republicans, and the latest gaffe will only further erode his standing and his ability to lead.
Lott stands to become the most unpopular congressional Republican since Newt Gingrich. That alone shouldn't be disqualifying (and NR defended Gingrich from most of the charges hurled at him). Consider, however, the comparison: Gingrich became a reviled public figure who had won a historic victory in 1994 and possessed an active (sometimes overactive) political imagination. Lott will be a reviled public figure who is a sub-par Majority Leader, period.
NR tries to make its practical political judgments based on what is best for the conservative cause. The advantage of maintaining Lott as Majority Leader as opposed to any number of his colleagues — not just Nickles, but Jon Kyl, Mitch McConnell, Rick Santorum — is nil. He can only be a drag. Conservatives should be able to argue for constitutionalist judges, race-blind governmental policies, tighter immigration laws, welfare reform, and limited government generally without the dead weight of a Senate Majority Leader who has created a cloud over himself and his party through his own thoughtlessness.
It will no doubt be difficult for Lott's colleagues, who are his friends, to force him out of his job. That's why Lott should realize the damage he has done to his party, and step aside. Failing that, the White House, with a broader political perspective than that of the members of the Senate club, should urge him to relinquish his leadership position.
Minority leader Tom Daschle's initial reaction (prior to his mauling by the Congressional Black Caucus) to Lott's remarks was essentially sound — Lott misspoke. But Lott misspoke in a particular way, one freighted with symbolic significance. Many southern whites of a certain generation have a shameful past on civil-rights issues. This doesn't necessarily make them reprehensible people, or mean that they are racists today. But, when they are public figures, it is reasonable to expect from them an honest reckoning with their past, and, of course, an awareness that a reckoning is necessary.
Many conservatives will be tempted to defend Lott because of the nature of some of the attacks on him. It's an understandable impulse. But it is possible for someone simultaneously to suffer unfair attacks, handle himself and his predicament poorly, and be an underwhelming political figure. Trent Lott has managed a trifecta. For NR to rally to his side now would amount to defending him because he is being accused of racism.
We usually pride ourselves on being fair-weather critics of, and foul-weather friends to, conservative politicians. Lott is in for a long bout of foul weather. But we can't be loyal to a Majority Leader who we didn't support in the first place.
Wonder if that 'drag' comment was intended as I suspect it was? LOL LOL LOL ..... Oh, well, typical whispered D.C. rumors..... Lott is the ultimate embarassment. Trent Lott's Theme Song ought to be:
"I'm too stupid for my shirt ... I'm too stupid for my shirt .... I'm Stupid ..."
GWB must tell him to resign as Majority Leader.
Can't say as I disagree.
It's not up to Bush to decided .. it is up to the Republicans to make that call .. they were the ones that elected Lott
What’s next? Is the RNC going to issue a Guide Book on Political Correctness that explains to all its members what "little" they can say about "anything" so that no member will ever utter a sentence that could ever possibly be construed as racist under any Upside Down "Warped" liberal standard?
If so, Hell, why talk at all. It only gets a conservative in trouble.
I've seen this circular firing squad many times before in the Republican Party. IMO, this party just can't stand success.
I see they have the same barber.
Sir, it required no courage to do that; it required no magnanimity to do it; it required hate - bitter, malignant, sectional feeling - and a sense of personal impunity. The Gentleman, I believe, takes rank among Christian statesman. He might have learned a better lesson even from the pages of mythology. When Prometheus was bound to a rock, it was not an eagle, it was a vulture, that buried his beak in the tortured vitals of the victim.
This has nothing to do with PC. What he said was an implicit endorsement of segregationist policies. If you think that is PC you have no concept of what PC means.
Either Lott believes in segregation or he is just too stupid to recognize what he said. In either case he shouldn't be GOP majority leader of the Senate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.