Is that why PH keeps posting that link to the Sciam article that has Hardison's joke in it? This article doesn't mention creationists.
I would bet the vast majority of the scientists who do not read the source material are Darwininians. I would have said exclusively, but I suppose random chance would allow a few attentive Darwininians. It would also seem that natural selection favors the non-reading Darwininian. It makes for more interesting just-so stories.