Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lelio
There is nothing wrong with that practice: please see #19.
26 posted on 12/15/2002 4:27:06 PM PST by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: TopQuark
But we're not talking about having to read Newton's works to write down F=Ma, its more like siting a paper on global warming and then taking a study from that as gospel w/o reading it. Compounding of errors and all that. Perhaps the underlying paper made some assumptions that the 2nd paper doesn't accurately account for and you're making totally different ones in your own paper.
Its the academic version of Telephone.
29 posted on 12/15/2002 4:36:31 PM PST by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson