Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur
Why did he bring up Segregation to begin with, with his '48 comments? Because he is stupid, that's why.
23 posted on 12/14/2002 11:05:29 AM PST by tomahawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: tomahawk
Why did he bring up Segregation to begin with, with his '48 comments?

He didn't bring it up.

You're bringing it up, along with all those whose racial-trip wires are set low to the ground.

35 posted on 12/14/2002 11:10:44 AM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: tomahawk
This is starting to get personal for me I spose. I have a co-worker who is a racist. Not a person who wears a pointy hood, or does anything destructive, but he insults blacks, Indians, jews, catholics etc...

He is upset at Lott... for apologizing. I do know what is in his heart alot better than some of the Lott apologists here, but I am troubled that some of them are not simply standing up for the GOP in their mind, or fighting the liberals, or what have you, but are simply racist themselves, and actually do agree that the dixiecrats were swell folks.

I am so thankful Bush is the president. I have a sneaky feeling this is more an age thing than anything else. Those of us who were born say after the 1964 voting rights act, have a very different experience than those born before.

I grew up knowing that slavery and Jim Crow were sad relics of the past, and that anybody could make it in this country regardless of race, with a combination of intelligence, drive, and opportunity.

My co-worker is 60. Went to segregated schools, drank at separate fountains, and didn't actually know any black person personally growing up. Your formative years do matter. I knew stupid people of asian decent, brilliant african americans, and Mexicans who could play basketball. Living in a desegregated world made me realize that both quotas, and segregation were both poor policies. I think Trent Lott's kids (does he have some) would have a much different world view, conservative yes, but more exposed to the differences around them

Just my random musings.

50 posted on 12/14/2002 11:16:25 AM PST by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: tomahawk
He referenced the 1948 Dixiecrats and his love of them and how if they'd won we'd all be better off and...and...and. But, the 1948 Dixiecrats were all about state's rights and not segregation, not at all. Nope, the fact that all 9 planks of the Dixiecrat Platform were born of racism has nothing to do with this latest Lott-debacle. Nope, not at all. He didn't say it. Huh-uh. It wasn't a good ole boy inference about segregation at a former segregationist's birhtday, and for the RATS to take it as such and use it weaken if not batter the GOP is all our imagination....
174 posted on 12/14/2002 12:21:36 PM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson