Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fred Mertz
Not far from it.

How else should we interpret it?

Why is Trent proud that his state voted for a ticket whose sole focus was maintaining Jim Crow?

Why did he make the exact same remark at a Reagan fundraiser in 1980 - and God knows how many other times besides that didn't have cameras available?

Lott did not "mispeak." He did not confuse Jesse Jackson for Michael Jackson or use the word "niggardly" in proper (or improper) context. He spoke two full sentences that don't need much interpretation.

What "problems" would we not have had if Thurmond had been elected in 1948?

Sorry. I just don't buy that Trent was trying to say nice things about Strom at his birthday party and flubbed a word or two.

He ended up breathing new life into the scurrilous notion that underneath every Republican is a sheet-wearing racist.

181 posted on 12/14/2002 12:24:55 PM PST by The Iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]


To: The Iguana
He ended up breathing new life into the scurrilous notion that underneath every Republican is a sheet-wearing racist.

Do you know one of Senator Byrd's nicknames?

184 posted on 12/14/2002 12:26:47 PM PST by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies ]

To: The Iguana
He ended up breathing new life into the scurrilous notion that underneath every Republican is a sheet-wearing racist.

Beautifully said. And we need to clean our party of that impression.

If only the Dems have a policy of holding on to racists for power's sake, then we have given the American people a true choice. If we behave as they do, Americans are right to eschew both parties as hypocritical power-grubbers.

192 posted on 12/14/2002 12:30:41 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson