No one I know wants to crucify Lott. No Republican wants him to leave the Senate. We just want him to place the good of the party and the nation above his personal career path. The fact that Lott doesn't seem willing to do that -- in time of war no less -- says much about his character.
Keeping Lott as one of our party's leaders will damage us. Placing McConnell or Frist or Nickles into leadership will help us. My first concern is getting this nation on the right track, not soothing the fragile ego of a spoiled, old aristrocrat who has never done ANYTHING for conservatism except damage it.
I'm sorry to see several Freepers place a higher priority on "sticking it to Sharpton" than they do to winning the War on Terror, electing conservative judges and creating a better America. The GOP will stick it to Sharpton alright, and lose the Senate and the House in 2004. But I guess that's okay, since Lott said he likes being Minority Leader better than being Majority Leader (immediately after pathetically losing the Senate to Daschle).
Demanding that Lott resign his leadership position in humiliation, accept the brand of racist, and then take a seat in the back row of the Senate chamber IS a political crucifixion.
Can you name one politician who would do this?
Give this some time to play out. Who knows what family pressures may make demands on Lott's time six months from now.