Replies

I'm not and I'm not judging the Lott in the context of the Lefties.

1.
Posted by ApesForEvolution to ApesForEvolution
On News/Activism 12/14/2002

Good grief. Segragationist. Segragationist. Segragationist. I'm so tired it still doesn't look correctly spelled to me.

2.
Posted by ApesForEvolution to Bisesi On News/Activism 12/14/2002
The RATS have and they're to make sure that we all know about it.

3.
Posted by ApesForEvolution to John Lenin
On News/Activism 12/13/2002

I know, I know where you're coming from and I *do* appreciate your opinion.

What I see is an energized RAT that had nothing lately, after 11/5, but a victory in LA that really didn't mean *that* much. BUT, that being said, if significantly MORE blacks are motivated...

These never end and not only do you consistently do what you deny, you seem to be able to predict the future, always negative. I only browsed 300 posts, do you ever have positive things to say?

Yes, without reading the RAT press it is still predictable. I'm saying that if even a conservative can't honestly conclude that what he said in context of the sum of his recent and ancient past, then what does it matter if the lefties are howling about it.

If the Lott hadn't said it last week and if he didn't have a past that corroborates the worst you could take from his remarks, then it wouldn't be an issue.

That's what Joe Blow is going to see, over and over and over again.

And, for the record, the first post you put up was my illumination of a typo. Segregation. There, I got it right.