Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bigun
MANY of you oppose Lott because you see him as ineffective or moderate. OK but lets return to the issue at hand. 1. Lott does not support segregation just about no one in 2002 does (except a few radical black separatist leaders). 2. Lott was praising a 100 YEAR OLD man for God's sake. 3. Lott said NOTHING in support of segregation and he has forcefully denounced it since.

I heard Maxine Waters denouncing Lott as a racist. Are some of us FINALLY going to confront that leftist scum for telling Fidel Castro NOT to extradite a black "freedom fighter" who murdered a NJ State Trooper? Our country would be in flames if her ilk ever takes over.

Further, in terms of racism, on all counts the Democrat party takes the prize over Republicans. For Gods' sake, the democrats WERE the Confederacy. They WERE the slave owners. THey WERE the lynchers and church bombers. They created and enforced and preserved Jim Crow and segregation. Snap out of it!

39 posted on 12/14/2002 8:56:49 AM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Williams
MANY of you oppose Lott...

If I have, in any way, given you the impression that I am a part of that crowd then I appologize!

I have certianly taken exception to things he has done, such as his sorry performance in the impeachment episode, but I have NEVER opposed him, and I do not now!

Doug is EXACTLY right when he says that this is about undoing an election and they are using the ONLY means they have at their disposal to do so! The $%@@#$#$#$% MEDIA!

47 posted on 12/14/2002 9:07:37 AM PST by Bigun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson