Replies

"The particular perception in question, which is not that Lott in particular but that the Republican Party in general is racist, if allowed to stand, will kill the GOP as an electorally viable party, which means the United States becomes a one-party country, a disaster in itself, a far worse one because of the one party in question."

This incident is NOT the GOP's Hiroshima as you've imagined.

IF this blatant lie is allowed to "stand," the entire Republic and what it presumes to represent is nothing but a sham, and it's citizens not worthy of liberty. Period. Of ye of little faith...

Let me make one point clearer: the Republic-ending catastrophy we're facing isn't a Democratic win. It's the loss of the Republican Party as a viable party.

Again, with all due respect, IMO your assessment falls short.

As for your charge that Lott is seen conceding to the Black Caucus, I'm sure Dubya will step in and suggest a "slight" change in venue...

This incident is NOT the GOP's Hiroshima as you've imagined.

Not if Lott goes.

IF this blatant lie is allowed to "stand," the entire Republic and what it presumes to represent is nothing but a sham, and it's citizens not worthy of liberty. Period. Of ye of little faith...

What lie would that be? That Lott said the segregationist candidate should've won? He said it live on C-Span.

As for your other comments, I guess you're not objectively pro-tyranny, but simply pro-tyranny.

Again, with all due respect, IMO your assessment falls short.

But you have no counter-assessment.

As for your charge that Lott is seen conceding to the Black Caucus, I'm sure Dubya will step in and suggest a "slight" change in venue...

I'm not sure what you think it means, but a venue is the location where something is carried out, like a trial or a concert.

You've over-estimated Dubya and underestimated Lott's craven self-interestedness.