Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jwalsh07
You "Lottbots" keep trying to frame this issue incorrectly. Lott doesn't have to be racist to lose his ML position, being a stunningly vapid moron is reason enough.

By the way, defending a weak, foolish man is not my idea of principle...
69 posted on 12/14/2002 3:58:41 PM PST by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: over3Owithabrain
You "Lottbots" keep trying to frame this issue incorrectly. Lott doesn't have to be racist to lose his ML position, being a stunningly vapid moron is reason enough.

LOL, I opposed Lott for ML before you even knew who he was. If Lott steps down now, he's an admitted racist and if you can't understand that then you shouldn't be in the debate.

By the way, defending a weak, foolish man is not my idea of principle...

Not so weak after all. He seems to be making a fight out of it whether he wins or loses.

I assume you've taken the position that Lott should be a fine fellow and stay still while the firing squad gets them in their sights and then become a back bencher. If so you wouldn't know principle if it bit you on the ass.

71 posted on 12/14/2002 4:04:13 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson